Cited by 6Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsIoT-based Smart Home SystemsInternet of Things and AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Smart Light Recommending System Using Artificial Neural Network Algorithm

Akbar, Muchammad Ferdian, Gautama Putrada, Aji, Abdurohman, Maman·2019·2019 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT)

Abstract

This paper proposes smart light recommending system based on sleep monitoring data using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. lights are one of the biggest contributors to the power consumption of electrical equipment. The effort to reduce the use of lights is related to not using them when they are not in use. One of the moments when the lights are not used is when we are sleeping but some user sleep styles keep the lights on even when they are sleeping so the idea is how to turn off the lights after the user sleeps. To realize this idea, it is necessary to detect sleep which can be derived from the detection of heart rate by certain sensors. The sensors that are needed are those already embedded in Fitbit, a bracelet-shaped device that can detect various kinds of conditions in the human body. However, Fitbit cannot directly provide the sleep condition to the user or the lamp, but it can provide information in the form of logs, so that the lamp settings cannot be instantaneous. To overcome this problem a learning method can be applied to know sleep patterns that appear in logs produced by Fitbit. This paper applies ANN back propagation to learn the sleep patterns of users, especially sleep start time and sleep end time. Nine ANN models made from user sleep data are applied to 60 days of testing. From these models, the best results were given by the model which gave 82.27% accuracy for sleep start time and 98.28% for sleep end time. Accuracy is largely determined by the user's sleep style.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icoict.2019.8835192

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.005 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/CCDC.2017.7978724 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/BHI.2016.7455976 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.03.029 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.069 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akbar, M. F., Gautama Putrada, A., & Abdurohman, M.
Affiliations
Telkom University (ID)
Venue
2019 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W2974082939
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT-based Smart Home Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
smart lighting, sleep monitoring, sleep detection, heart rate sensor, Fitbit, sleep patterns, energy consumption reduction, artificial neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review