Malware traffic classification using convolutional neural network for representation learning
Abstract
Traffic classification is the first step for network anomaly detection or network based intrusion detection system and plays an important role in network security domain. In this paper we first presented a new taxonomy of traffic classification from an artificial intelligence perspective, and then proposed a malware traffic classification method using convolutional neural network by taking traffic data as images. This method needed no hand-designed features but directly took raw traffic as input data of classifier. To the best of our knowledge this interesting attempt is the first time of applying representation learning approach to malware traffic classification using raw traffic data. We determined that the best type of traffic representation is session with all layers through eight experiments. The method is validated in two scenarios including three types of classifiers and the experiment results show that our proposed method can satisfy the accuracy requirement of practical application.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BURST structure is tightly related to web content and can convey differences between BURSTs generated from different traffic categories.
“Moreover, we consider the tight relationship between BURST structure and the web content, which is able to convey the difference between BURSTs generated from different categories of traffic.”
From ET-BERT: A Contextualized Datagram Representation with Pre-training Transformers for Encrypted Traffic Classification (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 19 · Cited by 1,177
- Authors
- Wang, W., Zhu, M., Zeng, X., Ye, X., & Sheng, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- 2017 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 712-717
- ISSN
- 1976-7684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2606697812
- Cited by
- 1,177
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 139 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 25.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Information Networking (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- network traffic classification, convolutional neural networks, representation learning, network anomaly detection, intrusion detection, network security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review