The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiofilm activity of nano sized CuO
Abstract
Antibiofilm properties of bulk and nano-sized copper oxide (CuO) were investigated using four species of bacteria viz: Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeuriginosa (PAO1) and Pseudomonas putida. The effect of both commercial and synthesized nanoparticles on biofilm formation was investigated using different concentrations 0.02, 0.12, 0.24, 0.5, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 & 1.8 µg / mL). Both bulk (91% reduction) and nano-sized (93% reduction) particles significantly reduced biofilm formation in all the four species of bacteria. Concentration and size/shape of nanoparticles seemed to influence biofilm inhibition. Increase in NP concentration from 0.02 to 1.8 µg/mL resulted in a marginal increase in inhibition. While a similar increase in concentration of bulk particles, resulted in 18% decrease in biofilm inhibition. Differences in biofilm inhibition between bulk and nano-sized particles were marginal at low concentrations (0.02, 0.12 & 0.24 µg/mL), whereas prominent differences were observed from concentration of 0.5 µg/mL onwards for the bulk particles. The decrease in inhibition efficiency of bulk nanoparticles with increase in concentration may be attributed to the differences in size, shape, aggregation and settling behaviour. In general, higher efficiency was observed with S. aureus, E. coli and P. putida biofilms, whereas P. aeuriginosa cells showed more resistance in the presence of CuO nanoparticles. Results of the present study indicated that size and shape of the nanoparticles, seem to have an influence on the effective concentration, required for inhibition of biofilms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The combined impact of nanoparticles and amoxicillin is due to the cell wall lysis action of the amoxicillin and the DNA binding activity of the nanoparticles [36,37].”
From Antibacterial Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles Prepared by One-Step Laser Ablation in Liquid (2021) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
Baker, J., Sitthisak, S., Sengupta, M., Johnson, M., Jayaswal, R. K., & Morrissey, J. A. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02268-09 · Cited by 163
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.047 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2950-2958.2002 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3606120 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00656.x · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.00710-08 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00353-6 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4349-4352.2001 · DOI
- 10.1080/08927014.2011.597051 · DOI
- siel, 2011, Reduced Staphylococcus auresu proliferation and biofilm formation on zinc oxide nanoparticle PVC composite surfaces, Acta Biomaterialia, 7, 2579, 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1080/0892701031000072190 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrmicro821 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2 · DOI · Paper page
- tremaroli, 2011, A histidine-kinase cheA gene of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KF707 not only has a key role in chemotaxis but also affects biofilm formation and cell metabolism, Biofouling, 27, 3346, 10.1080/08927014.2010.537099 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.183.22.6579-6589.2001 · DOI
- 10.1002/bit.21838 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrmicro1838 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08927014.2011.579599 · DOI
Cited by
Antibacterial Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles Prepared by One-Step Laser Ablation in Liquid
Khashan, K. S., Sulaiman, G. M., Abdulameer, F. A., Albukhaty, S., Ibrahem, M. A., Al-Muhimeed, T., & AlObaid, A. A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11104623 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Sriyutha Murthy, P., Venugopalan, V. P., Arunya, D. D., Dhara, S., Pandiyan, R., & Tyagi, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Biofouling & Biofilm Processes Section, Water & Steam, Chemistry Division, BARC Facilities, IGCAR Campus, Kalpakkam 603 102, INDIA
- Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (IN)
- Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IN)
- Venue
- International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-11
- Pages
- 580-583
- OpenAlex
- W2076042457
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Keywords
- copper oxide nanoparticles, antibiofilm activity, biofilm inhibition, nanoparticle size and shape, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, nanoparticle concentration dependence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiofilm activity of nano sized CuO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iconset.2011.6168037
- The paper
- Sriyutha Murthy, P., Venugopalan, V. P., Arunya, D. D., Dhara, S., Pandiyan, R., & Tyagi, A. K. (2011). Antibiofilm activity of nano sized CuO. International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/iconset.2011.6168037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.