Pitch estimation using a modulation model of speech
Abstract
This paper presents a method of estimating pitch frequencies using a modulation model of speech. Both the amplitude envelope and instantaneous frequency deviation due to modulations present in speech carry fundamental frequency information. It is shown that demodulation of speech around any arbitrary frequency or in the vicinity of a formant brings out well resolved F0 in both the envelope and the instantaneous frequency. Values of F0 estimated from the modulation model for utterances under normal and stressed conditions were found consistent with those determined from a direct vocal tract model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prosody-independent feature of shimmer and jitter variables has benefits in noisy contexts.
“This prosody-independent feature of shimmer and jitter variables has benefits in noisy contexts (e.g., a flight cockpit) (Gopalan, 2000).”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Gopalan, 2000
Cites
Time-and spectrum- related variabilities in stressed speech under laboratory and real conditions.
Ruiz, R., Absil, E., Harmegnies, B., Legros, C., & Poch, D. (1996) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00048-9 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance
Van Puyvelde, M., Neyt, X., McGlone, F., & Pattyn, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01994 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“This prosody-independent feature of shimmer and jitter variables has benefits in noisy contexts (e.g., a flight cockpit) (Gopalan, 2000).”
Background
- Authors
- Gopalan, K.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University Northwest (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gopalan, K.
- Venue
- WCC 2000 - ICSP 2000. 2000 5th International Conference on Signal Processing Proceedings. 16th World Computer Congress 2000
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-11-08
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 786-791
- OpenAlex
- W2128982660
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- fundamental frequency estimation, fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, formants, vocal tract model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
