Cited by 70Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEmotion and Mood RecognitionVoice and Speech Disorders

Time-and spectrum- related variabilities in stressed speech under laboratory and real conditions.

Ruiz, Robert, Absil, Emmanuelle, Harmegnies, Bernard, Legros, Claude, Poch, Dolors·1996·Speech Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00048-9

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The different voice-responses observed in the pilot and co-pilot were interpreted as a potential result of the professional function and expected agency and coping.

    “The different voice-responses observed in the pilot and co-pilot were interpreted as a potential result of the professional function and expected agency and coping (i.e., the co-pilot as a more mediating function).”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Ruiz et al. (1996)

  • Ruiz et al. (1996) found a significant increase in F2 in the pilot and a significant decrease in F3 in the co-pilot.

    “With regard to the formant structure, Ruiz et al. (1996) found a significant increase in F2 in the pilot and a significant decrease in F3 in the co-pilot.”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Ruiz et al. (1996)

  • Ruiz et al. (1996) was the only study encountered that observed large F0 increases comparable with those during life-threatening emergency situations.

    “This was the only study we encountered that observed large F0 increases, comparable with those during life-threatening emergency situations.”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Ruiz et al. (1996)

  • Ruiz et al. (1996) found that in a pilot, a large F0-increase was observed mainly in the stress 1 condition, whereas the co-pilot only showed a dramatic increase in the stress-2 condition.

    “In the pilot, a large F0-increase was observed mainly in the stress 1 condition, whereas the co-pilot only showed a dramatic increase in the stress-2 condition.”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Ruiz et al. (1996)

  • In Ruiz et al. (1996), a formant analysis showed that the effects on the formants F1, F2, and F3 were vowel specific.

    “A formant analysis showed that the effects on the formants F1, F2, and F3 were vowel specific.”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Ruiz et al. (1996)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz, R., Absil, E., Harmegnies, B., Legros, C., & Poch, D.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
  • University of Mons (BE)
Corresponding author
Ruiz, Robert
Venue
Speech Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
20
Issue
1-2
Pages
111-129
ISSN
0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154262390
Cited by
69
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Speech Communication (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi UMONS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
speech stress, fundamental frequency, formant frequencies, Stroop task, aircraft crash, voice parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review