The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust Detection of Region-Duplication Forgery in Digital Image
Abstract
Region duplication forgery, in which a part of a digital image is copied and then pasted to another portion of the same image in order to conceal an important object in the scene, is one of the common image forgery techniques. In this paper, we describe an efficient and robust algorithm for detecting and localizing this type of malicious tampering. We present experimental results which show that our method is robust and can successfully detect this type of tampering for images that have been subjected to various forms of post region duplication image processing, including blurring, noise contamination, severe lossy compression, and a mixture of these processing operations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Region Filling and Object Removal by Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting
Criminisi, A., Perez, P., & Toyama, K. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2004.833105 · Cited by 3,258 · cited 1×
“Advances in computer vision and computer graphics have made image manipulation more and more sophisticated (see for example [11], [12]), How to detect forgeries using these advanced computer graphics technologies remains an open question.”
BackgroundDetection of Copy-Move Forgery in Digital Images
Fridrich, J. (2004) · Cited by 1,040
Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling
Popescu, A. C., & Farid, H. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.839932 · Cited by 795
Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images
Popescu, A. C., & Farid, H. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.855406 · Cited by 656
Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling
Popescu, A., & Farid, H. (2005) · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.839932(410 · Cited by 655
Exposing Digital Forgeries by Detecting Duplicated Image Regions
Popescu, A., & Farid, H. (2004) · Cited by 641
Physics-motivated features for distinguishing photographic images and computer graphics
Ng, T.-T., Chang, S.-F., Hsu, J., Xie, L., & Tsui, M.-P. (2005) · Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/1101149.1101192 · Cited by 188
Ng, T.-T., & Chang, S. (2005) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2004.1419512 · Cited by 134
Texture synthesis by fixed neighborhood searching
Levoy, M., & Wei, L. (2001) · Cited by 82
Cited by
Information Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2260814 · Cited by 394
Detection of Copy-Rotate-Move Forgery Using Zernike Moments
Ryu, S.-J., Lee, M.-J., & Lee, H.-K. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16435-4_5 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, W., Huang, J., & Qiu, G.
- Venue
- 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 746-749
- ISSN
- 1041-3278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127424286
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust Detection of Region-Duplication Forgery in Digital Image. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icpr.2006.1003
- The paper
- Luo, W., Huang, J., & Qiu, G. (2006). Robust Detection of Region-Duplication Forgery in Digital Image. 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06). https://doi.org/10.1109/icpr.2006.1003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
