Cited by 548Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Modelling uncertainty in deep learning for camera relocalization

Open access
Kendall, Alex, Cipolla, Roberto·2016·2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

We present a robust and real-time monocular six degree of freedom visual relocalization system. We use a Bayesian convolutional neural network to regress the 6-DOF camera pose from a single RGB image. It is trained in an end-to-end manner with no need of additional engineering or graph optimisation. The algorithm can operate indoors and outdoors in real time, taking under 6ms to compute. It obtains approximately 2m and 6° accuracy for very large scale outdoor scenes and 0.5m and 10° accuracy indoors. Using a Bayesian convolutional neural network implementation we obtain an estimate of the model's relocalization uncertainty and improve state of the art localization accuracy on a large scale outdoor dataset. We leverage the uncertainty measure to estimate metric relocalization error and to detect the presence or absence of the scene in the input image. We show that the model's uncertainty is caused by images being dissimilar to the training dataset in either pose or appearance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2016.7487679

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ResNet architectures with pre-trained weights have low number of pooling layers and good accuracy-complexity trade-off.

    “We adopted the ResNet architectures with pre-trained weights as the network backbone, due to its low number of pooling layers, and good accuracy-complexity trade-off [35].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-05
Pages
4762-4769
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2279895976
Cited by
548
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
107.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Apollo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
camera relocalization, Bayesian convolutional neural network, uncertainty estimation, 6D pose estimation, real-time localization, out-of-distribution detection, indoor and outdoor scenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review