Cited by 41Robot Manipulation and LearningProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsSoft Robotics and Applications

What does the person feel? Learning to infer applied forces during robot-assisted dressing

Erickson, Zackory, Clegg, Alexander, Yu, Wenhao, Turk, Greg, Liu, C. Karen, Kemp, Charles C.·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

During robot-assisted dressing, a robot manipulates a garment in contact with a person's body. Inferring the forces applied to the person's body by the garment might enable a robot to provide more effective assistance and give the robot insight into what the person feels. However, complex mechanics govern the relationship between the robot's end effector and these forces. Using a physics-based simulation and data-driven methods, we demonstrate the feasibility of inferring forces across a person's body using only end effector measurements. Specifically, we present a long short-term memory (LSTM) network that at each time step takes a 9-dimensional input vector of force, torque, and velocity measurements from the robot's end effector and outputs a force map consisting of hundreds of inferred force magnitudes across the person's body. We trained and evaluated LSTMs on two tasks: pulling a hospital gown onto an arm and pulhng shorts onto a leg. For both tasks, the LSTMs produced force maps that were similar to ground truth when visualized as heat maps across the limbs. We also evaluated their performance in terms of root-mean-square error. Their performance degraded when the end effector velocity was increased outside the training range, but generalized well to limb rotations. Overall, our results suggest that robots could learn to infer the forces people feel during robot-assisted dressing, although the extent to which this will generalize to the real world remains an open question.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2017.7989718

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erickson, Z., Clegg, A., Yu, W., Turk, G., Liu, C. K., & Kemp, C. C.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-05
Pages
6058-6065
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2737170915
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
long short-term memory networks, physical simulation, hospital gowns, assistive robotics, human-robot interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review