Cited by 167Tactile and Sensory InteractionsAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

Enabling independent navigation for visually impaired people through a wearable vision-based feedback system

Open access
Wang, Hsueh-Cheng, Katzschmann, Robert K., Teng, Santani, Araki, Brandon, Giarre, Laura, Rus, Daniela·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

This work introduces a wearable system to provide situational awareness for blind and visually impaired people. The system includes a camera, an embedded computer and a haptic device to provide feedback when an obstacle is detected. The system uses techniques from computer vision and motion planning to (1) identify walkable space; (2) plan step-by-step a safe motion trajectory in the space, and (3) recognize and locate certain types of objects, for example the location of an empty chair. These descriptions are communicated to the person wearing the device through vibrations. We present results from user studies with low- and high-level tasks, including walking through a maze without collisions, locating a chair, and walking through a crowded environment while avoiding people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2017.7989772

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visual-navigation systems for the visually impaired share some basic features like localization, obstacle recognition, path planning of SLAM for autonomous driving in smart transportation and smart agriculture, but also have some differences.

    “3) visual-navigation systems for the visually impaired [142], [143], [144], share some basic features like localization, obstacle recognition, path planning of SLAM for autonomous driving in smart transportation and smart agriculture (Section IV-B and Section IV-G), but also have some differences.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, H.-C., Katzschmann, R. K., Teng, S., Araki, B., Giarre, L., & Rus, D.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-05
Pages
6533-6540
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2736525866
Cited by
167
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 3
FWCI
30.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
visually impaired navigation, wearable assistive technology, haptic feedback, obstacle detection, motion planning, situational awareness, object recognition, collision avoidance, maze navigation, user study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review