Cited by 308Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

Self-Supervised Deep Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Computation Graphs for Robot Navigation

Open access
Kahn, Gregory, Villaflor, Adam, Ding, Bosen, Abbeel, Pieter, Levine, Sergey·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Enabling robots to autonomously navigate complex environments is essential for real-world deployment. Prior methods approach this problem by having the robot maintain an internal map of the world, and then use a localization and planning method to navigate through the internal map. However, these approaches often include a variety of assumptions, are computationally intensive, and do not learn from failures. In contrast, learning-based methods improve as the robot acts in the environment, but are difficult to deploy in the real-world due to their high sample complexity. To address the need to learn complex policies with few samples, we propose a generalized computation graph that subsumes value-based model-free methods and model-based methods, with specific instantiations interpolating between model-free and model-based. We then instantiate this graph to form a navigation model that learns from raw images and is sample efficient. Our simulated car experiments explore the design decisions of our navigation model, and show our approach outperforms single-step andN-step double Q-learning. We also evaluate our approach on a real-world RC car and show it can learn to navigate through a complex indoor environment with a few hours of fully autonomous, self-supervised training. Videos of the experiments and code can be found at github.com/gkahn13/gcg.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2018.8460655

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahn, G., Villaflor, A., Ding, B., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-05
Pages
5129-5136
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2759463506
Cited by
308
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
17.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1614653)
  • Nvidia
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
self-supervised learning, deep reinforcement learning, robot navigation, sample efficiency, image-based navigation, indoor navigation, learning from failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review