Self-Supervised Deep Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Computation Graphs for Robot Navigation
Open accessAbstract
Enabling robots to autonomously navigate complex environments is essential for real-world deployment. Prior methods approach this problem by having the robot maintain an internal map of the world, and then use a localization and planning method to navigate through the internal map. However, these approaches often include a variety of assumptions, are computationally intensive, and do not learn from failures. In contrast, learning-based methods improve as the robot acts in the environment, but are difficult to deploy in the real-world due to their high sample complexity. To address the need to learn complex policies with few samples, we propose a generalized computation graph that subsumes value-based model-free methods and model-based methods, with specific instantiations interpolating between model-free and model-based. We then instantiate this graph to form a navigation model that learns from raw images and is sample efficient. Our simulated car experiments explore the design decisions of our navigation model, and show our approach outperforms single-step andN-step double Q-learning. We also evaluate our approach on a real-world RC car and show it can learn to navigate through a complex indoor environment with a few hours of fully autonomous, self-supervised training. Videos of the experiments and code can be found at github.com/gkahn13/gcg.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A different solution was proposed in [43], where progressive nets [74] are employed for sim-to-real information transfer.
“A different solution was proposed in [43], where progressive nets [74] are employed for sim-to-real information transfer.”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [74]
Cites
Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., & Riedmiller, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.5602 · Cited by 9,471 · see citing works
Dyna, an Integrated Architecture for Learning, Planning, and Reacting
Sutton, R. S. (1991) · ACM SIGART Bulletin · doi:10.1145/122344.122377 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications and Emerging Research Trends
Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2830661 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
RoboTHOR: An Open Simulation-to-Real Embodied AI Platform
Deitke, M., Han, W., Herrasti, A., Kembhavi, A., Kolve, E., Mottaghi, R., Salvador, J., Schwenk, D., VanderBilt, E., Wallingford, M., et al. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00323 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Salvato, E., Fenu, G., Medvet, E., & Pellegrino, F. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3126658 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kahn, G., Villaflor, A., Ding, B., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-05
- Pages
- 5129-5136
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2759463506
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 17.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1614653)
- Nvidia
- Army Research Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- self-supervised learning, deep reinforcement learning, robot navigation, sample efficiency, image-based navigation, indoor navigation, learning from failure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review