Cited by 97Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningRobot Manipulation and Learning

Meta reinforcement learning for sim-to-real domain adaptation

Open access
Arndt, Karol, Hazara, Murtaza, Ghadirzadeh, Ali, Kyrki, Ville·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Modern reinforcement learning methods suffer from low sample efficiency and unsafe exploration, making it infeasible to train robotic policies entirely on real hardware. In this work, we propose to address the problem of sim-to-real domain transfer by using meta learning to train a policy that can adapt to a variety of dynamic conditions, and using a task-specific trajectory generation model to provide an action space that facilitates quick exploration. We evaluate the method by performing domain adaptation in simulation and analyzing the structure of the latent space during adaptation. We then deploy this policy on a KUKA LBR 4+ robot and evaluate its performance on a task of hitting a hockey puck to a target. Our method shows more consistent and stable domain adaptation than the baseline, resulting in better overall performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196540

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In robotic vision tasks, training data from simulators always have different textures, lighting, and camera positions from realistic environments.

    “In robotic vision tasks including object localization [53], object detection [54], pose estimation [55], and semantic segmentation [56], the training data from simulator always have different textures, lighting, and camera positions from the realistic environments.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arndt, K., Hazara, M., Ghadirzadeh, A., & Kyrki, V.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-05
Pages
2725-2731
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976047560
Cited by
97
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
meta-reinforcement learning, sim-to-real transfer, domain adaptation, trajectory generation, latent space structure, sample efficiency, safe exploration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review