The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Model- and Acceleration-based Pursuit Controller for High-Performance Autonomous Racing
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous racing is a research field gaining large popularity, as it pushes autonomous driving algorithms to their limits and serves as a catalyst for general autonomous driving. For scaled autonomous racing platforms, the computational constraint and complexity often limit the use of Model Predictive Control (MPC). As a consequence, geometric controllers are the most frequently deployed controllers. They prove to be performant while yielding implementation and operational simplicity. Yet, they inherently lack the incorporation of model dynamics, thus limiting the race car to a velocity domain where tire slip can be neglected. This paper presents Model- and Acceleration-based Pursuit (MAP) a high-performance model-based trajectory tracking controller that preserves the simplicity of geometric approaches while leveraging tire dynamics. The proposed algorithm allows accurate tracking of a trajectory at unprecedented velocities compared to State-of-the-Art (SotA) geometric controllers. The MAP controller is experimentally validated and outperforms the reference geometric controller four-fold in terms of lateral tracking error, yielding a tracking error of 0.055 m at tested speeds up to 11 m/s on a scaled racecar. Code: https://github.com/ETH-PBL/MAP-Controller.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RL techniques lag behind SotA traditional control techniques on F1TENTH.
“the performance of RL techniques is lagging behind when compared to SotA traditional control techniques, such as in [5].”
From RLPP: A Residual Method for Zero-Shot Real-World Autonomous Racing on Scaled Platforms (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1080/00423110408969994 · DOI
- 0, Building the F1 TENTH Car
- liniger, 2021, Pushing the limits of friction A story of model mismatch
- 10.5772/61391 · DOI
- otterness, 2019, The “disparity extender” algorithm and f1/tenth
- 10.1080/00423114.2019.1631455 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.robot.2012.05.021 · DOI
- 10.1080/00423111003746140 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023071 · DOI
- 10.1109/IWCIA.2017.8203557 · DOI
- 10.1002/oca.2123 · DOI
- 10.1109/IVS.2018.8500623 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341731 · DOI
- ollero, 0, Fuzzy supervisory path tracking of mobile robots1, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 26, 277, 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)49312-8 · DOI
- 10.1080/17430437.2019.1710131 · DOI
- 10.24251/HICSS.2017.577 · DOI
- snider, 2009, Automatic Steering Methods for Autonomous Automobile Path Tracking
- 10.1109/IVS.2017.7995816 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.06.064 · DOI
- 10.1002/rob.22063 · DOI
- frohlich, 2021, Model learning and contextual controller tuning for autonomous racing
- jain, 2020, BayesRace Learning to race autonomously using prior experience
- 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561049 · DOI
- 10.1109/LRA.2021.3064284 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561590 · DOI
- 10.2514/6.2004-4900 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636518 · DOI
- 10.1109/IVS.2017.7995802 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636053 · DOI
- sukhil, 2021, Adaptive lookahead pure-pursuit for autonomous racing
- 10.1002/rob.21977 · DOI
- betz, 2019, A software archi-tecture for an autonomous racecar, 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Spring), 1
- o'kelly, 2020, F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for con-tinuous control and reinforcement learning, N eurIP S 2019 Competition and Demonstration Track PMLR, 77
- 10.1002/rob.21743 · DOI
- 10.1109/OJITS.2022.3181510 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-662-64550-5_10 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197080 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RLPP: A Residual Method for Zero-Shot Real-World Autonomous Racing on Scaled Platforms
Ghignone, E., Baumann, N., Hu, C., Wang, J., Xie, L., Carron, A., & Magno, M. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127278 · Cited by 1
“This assumption no longer holds true when the agent is pushed to the friction limits, resulting in lower racing performance compared to model-based control methods that incorporate tire dynamics [5].”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, J., Imholz, N., Schwarzenbach, L., Ghignone, E., Baumann, N., & Magno, M.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-05-29
- Pages
- 5276-5283
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383109279
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- autonomous racing, acceleration-based control, tire dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review