Cited by 499Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Information Needs in Collocated Software Development Teams

Ko, Amy J., DeLine, Robert, Venolia, Gina·2007·29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07)

Abstract

Previous research has documented the fragmented nature of software development work. To explain this in more detail, we analyzed software developers' day-to-day information needs. We observed seventeen developers at a large software company and transcribed their activities in go-minute sessions. We analyzed these logs for the information that developers sought, the sources that they used, and the situations th at prevented inform action from being acquired. We identified twenty-one information types and cataloged the outcome and source when each type of information was sought. The most frequently sought information included awareness about artifacts and coworkers. The most often deferred searches included knowledge about design and program behavior, such as why code was written a particular way, what a program was supposed to do, and the cause of a program state. Developers often had to defer tasks because the only source of knowledge was unavailable coworkers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icse.2007.45

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Developers spend a significant amount of time searching and foraging for information and organizing and digesting the information they find.

    “Consequently, developers spend a significant amount of time searching and foraging for the information they need and organizing and digesting the information they find [30,31,34,44,48,57].”

    From Using an LLM to Help With Code Understanding (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ko, A. J., DeLine, R., & Venolia, G.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2007-05
Pages
344-353
ISSN
0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100894766
Cited by
499
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 50
FWCI
27.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
information needs, software development teams, collocated teams, software developers, information seeking, knowledge sources, knowledge sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review