The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic creation of SQL Injection and cross-site scripting attacks
Open accessAbstract
We present a technique for finding security vulnerabilities in Web applications. SQL Injection (SQLI) and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks are widespread forms of attack in which the attacker crafts the input to the application to access or modify user data and execute malicious code. In the most serious attacks (called second-order, or persistent, XSS), an attacker can corrupt a database so as to cause subsequent users to execute malicious code.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Language-based information-flow security
Sabelfeld, A., & Myers, A. C. (2003) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2002.806121 · Cited by 1,907
Cited by
Brubaker, C., Jana, S., Ray, B., Khurshid, S., & Shmatikov, V. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2014.15 · Cited by 218
Johari, R., & Sharma, P. (2012) · 2012 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies · doi:10.1109/csnt.2012.104 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Kieyzun, A., Guo, P. J., Jayaraman, K., & Ernst, M. D.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE 31st International Conference on Software Engineering
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 199-209
- OpenAlex
- W2166381878
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
