The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classifying Developers into Core and Peripheral: An Empirical Study on Count and Network Metrics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prior work documents that such clarification-oriented feedback is more prevalent when contributors have more limited project familiarity (Rullani and Haefliger 2013, Tsay et al. 2014, Joblin et al. 2017).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot (2024) · cites this paper as Joblin et al. 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The social structure of free and open source software development
Crowston, K., & Howison, J. (2005) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v10i2.1207 · Cited by 474
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- ye, 2003, Toward an understanding of the motivation open source software developers, Proc International Conference on Software Engineering, 419
- 10.1109/SBES.2010.26 · DOI
- shull, 2007, Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering
- 10.1109/MSR.2009.5069497 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032803 · DOI
- 10.1109/HICSS.2006.101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1099203.1099239 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSE.2011.19 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSE.2005.73 · DOI
- feinerer, 2014, tm.plugin.mail: Text Mining E-Mail Plug-In, R package version 0 3–3
- hamilton, 1994, Time Series Analysis, 2, 10.1515/9780691218632 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/940071.940091 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2007.74 · DOI
- 10.1145/2025113.2025127 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1453101.1453107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-642-33284-5_8 · DOI
- 10.1109/MSR.2007.23 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/0-387-34226-5_28 · DOI
- bishop, 2006, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
- 10.1145/1460563.1460654 · DOI · Paper page
- brandes, 2005, Network Analysis Methodological Foundations, 10.1007/b106453 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1137983.1138016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSE.2012.32 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606615 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10664-016-9478-9 · DOI
- 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSE.2015.73 · DOI
- 10.1145/1985793.1985832 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.04.012 · DOI
- 10.1145/512035.512055 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/567793.567795 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
(2018) · doi:10.1145/3180155.3180209 · Cited by 98
Bayesian Data Analysis in Empirical Software Engineering Research
Furia, C. A., Feldt, R., & Torkar, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2019.2935974 · Cited by 42
Song, F., Agarwal, A., & Wen, W. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal (preprint) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4856935 · Cited by 30
Linåker, J., Regnell, B., & Damian, D. (2019) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2019.04.010 · Cited by 14
Behind Developer Contributions on Conflicting Merge Scenarios
Vale, G., Fernandes, E., Figueiredo, E., & Apel, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE 23rd International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM) · doi:10.1109/scam59687.2023.00014 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Joblin, M., Apel, S., Hunsen, C., & Mauerer, W.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-05
- Pages
- 164-174
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classifying Developers into Core and Peripheral: An Empirical Study on Count and Network Metrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icse.2017.23
- The paper
- Joblin, M., Apel, S., Hunsen, C., & Mauerer, W. (2017). Classifying Developers into Core and Peripheral: An Empirical Study on Count and Network Metrics. 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2017.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.