The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine health monitoring with LSTM networks
Abstract
Effective machine health monitoring systems are critical to modern manufacturing systems and industries. Among various machine health monitoring approaches, data-driven methods are gaining in popularity due to the development of advanced sensing and data analytic techniques. However, sensory data that is a kind of sequential data can not serve as direct meaningful representations for machine conditions due to its noise, varying length and irregular sampling. A majority of previous models focus on feature extraction/fusion methods that involve expensive human labor and high quality expert knowledge. With the development of deep learning methods in the last few years, representation learning from raw data has been redefined. Among deep learning models, Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs) are able to capture long-term dependencies and model sequential data. Therefore, LSTMs is able to work on the sensory data of machine condition. Here, the first study about a empirical evaluation of LSTMs-based machine health monitoring systems is presented. A real life tool wear test is introduced. Basic and deep LSTMs are designed to predict the actual tool wear based on raw sensory data. The experimental results have shown that our models, especially deep LSTMs, are able to outperform several state-of-arts baseline methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Show and tell: A neural image caption generator
Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S., & Erhan, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298935 · Cited by 6,318
Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298932 · Cited by 4,902
Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: An overview
Yin, S., Li, X., Gao, H., & Kaynak, O. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2308133 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring
Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 · Cited by 2,894
Self-citationA review on the application of deep learning in system health management
Khan, S., & Yairi, T. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024 · Cited by 1,133
Machine learning in materials science
Wei, J., Chu, X., Sun, X., Xu, K., Deng, H., Chen, J., Wei, Z., & Lei, M. (2019) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12028 · Cited by 1,069
Fink, O., Wang, Q., Svensén, M., Dersin, P., Lee, W.-J., & Ducoffe, M. (2020) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103678 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, R., Wang, J., Yan, R., & Mao, K.
- Venue
- 2016 10th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-11
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2564947831
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine health monitoring with LSTM networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icsenst.2016.7796266
- The paper
- Zhao, R., Wang, J., Yan, R., & Mao, K. (2016). Machine health monitoring with LSTM networks. 2016 10th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsenst.2016.7796266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.