Cited by 6,318Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Show and tell: A neural image caption generator

Vinyals, Oriol, Toshev, Alexander, Bengio, Samy, Erhan, Dumitru·2015·2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Automatically describing the content of an image is a fundamental problem in artificial intelligence that connects computer vision and natural language processing. In this paper, we present a generative model based on a deep recurrent architecture that combines recent advances in computer vision and machine translation and that can be used to generate natural sentences describing an image. The model is trained to maximize the likelihood of the target description sentence given the training image. Experiments on several datasets show the accuracy of the model and the fluency of the language it learns solely from image descriptions. Our model is often quite accurate, which we verify both qualitatively and quantitatively. For instance, while the current state-of-the-art BLEU-1 score (the higher the better) on the Pascal dataset is 25, our approach yields 59, to be compared to human performance around 69. We also show BLEU-1 score improvements on Flickr30k, from 56 to 66, and on SBU, from 19 to 28. Lastly, on the newly released COCO dataset, we achieve a BLEU-4 of 27.7, which is the current state-of-the-art.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298935

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S., & Erhan, D.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-06
Pages
3156-3164
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1895577753
Cited by
6,318
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 228 · 2025: 464 · 2024: 547 · 2023: 598 · 2022: 589 · 2021: 747 · 2020: 748 · 2019: 770 · 2018: 656 · 2017: 471 · 2016: 329 · 2015: 158 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
220.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
image captioning, recurrent neural networks, generative models, machine translation, image description generation, PASCAL dataset, Flickr30k, COCO dataset, BLEU evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review