Cited by 582Network Security and Intrusion DetectionNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization

Distributed denial of service attacks

Lau, F., Rubin, S.H., Smith, M.H., Trajkovic, L.·2002·SMC 2000 Conference Proceedings. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 'Cybernetics Evolving to Systems, Humans, Organizations, and their Complex Interactions' (Cat. No.00CH37166)

Abstract

We discuss distributed denial of service attacks in the Internet. We were motivated by the widely known February 2000 distributed attacks on Yahoo!, Amazon.com, CNN.com, and other major Web sites. A denial of service is characterized by an explicit attempt by an attacker to prevent legitimate users from using resources. An attacker may attempt to: "flood" a network and thus reduce a legitimate user's bandwidth, prevent access to a service, or disrupt service to a specific system or a user. We describe methods and techniques used in denial of service attacks, and we list possible defences. In our study, we simulate a distributed denial of service attack using ns-2 network simulator. We examine how various queuing algorithms implemented in a network router perform during an attack, and whether legitimate users can obtain desired bandwidth. We find that under persistent denial of service attacks, class based queuing algorithms can guarantee bandwidth for certain classes of input flows.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsmc.2000.886455

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2000, a DoS attack on Yahoo rendered the site non-operational for more than 3 h; the attack was based on a Smurf attack and a Tribe Flood Network Technique; Yahoo received data requests of around or greater than one gigabyte per second.

    “In 2000, a DoS attack on Yahoo rendered the site non-operational for more than 3 h. The attack was based on a Smurf attack and a Tribe Flood Network Technique. Through this attack, Yahoo received data requests of around or greater than one gigabyte per second [31].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 582

Authors
Lau, F., Rubin, S. H., Smith, M. H., & Trajkovic, L.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
SMC 2000 Conference Proceedings. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 'Cybernetics Evolving to Systems, Humans, Organizations, and their Complex Interactions' (Cat. No.00CH37166)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2002-11-07
Volume
3
Pages
2275-2280
ISSN
1062-922X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117636524
Cited by
582
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
FWCI
13.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
Keywords
DDoS attacks, denial-of-service attacks, network flooding, class-based queuing, network simulation, NS2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review