Distributed denial of service attacks
Abstract
We discuss distributed denial of service attacks in the Internet. We were motivated by the widely known February 2000 distributed attacks on Yahoo!, Amazon.com, CNN.com, and other major Web sites. A denial of service is characterized by an explicit attempt by an attacker to prevent legitimate users from using resources. An attacker may attempt to: "flood" a network and thus reduce a legitimate user's bandwidth, prevent access to a service, or disrupt service to a specific system or a user. We describe methods and techniques used in denial of service attacks, and we list possible defences. In our study, we simulate a distributed denial of service attack using ns-2 network simulator. We examine how various queuing algorithms implemented in a network router perform during an attack, and whether legitimate users can obtain desired bandwidth. We find that under persistent denial of service attacks, class based queuing algorithms can guarantee bandwidth for certain classes of input flows.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 2000, a DoS attack on Yahoo rendered the site non-operational for more than 3 h; the attack was based on a Smurf attack and a Tribe Flood Network Technique; Yahoo received data requests of around or greater than one gigabyte per second.
“In 2000, a DoS attack on Yahoo rendered the site non-operational for more than 3 h. The attack was based on a Smurf attack and a Tribe Flood Network Technique. Through this attack, Yahoo received data requests of around or greater than one gigabyte per second [31].”
From Impact, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigation Strategies for Cyber-Secure Critical Infrastructure. (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 582
- Authors
- Lau, F., Rubin, S. H., Smith, M. H., & Trajkovic, L.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- ORCID
- Smith, M.H.
- Venue
- SMC 2000 Conference Proceedings. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 'Cybernetics Evolving to Systems, Humans, Organizations, and their Complex Interactions' (Cat. No.00CH37166)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-11-07
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 2275-2280
- ISSN
- 1062-922X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117636524
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Keywords
- DDoS attacks, denial-of-service attacks, network flooding, class-based queuing, network simulation, NS2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review