2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs are able to explain their answers to textbook questions in about half of the cases.
“and are able to explain their answers to textbook questions in about half of the cases [103].”
From The Robots Are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education (2023) · cites this paper as [103]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Robots Are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education
Prather, J., Denny, P., Leinonen, J., Becker, B. A., Albluwi, I., Craig, M., Keuning, H., Kiesler, N., Kohn, T., Luxton-Reilly, A., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3623762.3633499 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Benchmarking automated GUI testing for Android against real-world bugs
Su, T., Wang, J., & Su, Z. (2021) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3468264.3468620 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Önden, A., Kara, K., Önden, İ., Yalçın, G. C., Šimić, V., & Pamucar, D. S. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108378 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Speed and Performance of Parserless and Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Methods on Software Logs
Nyyssölä, J., & Mäntylä, M. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) · doi:10.1109/qrs62785.2024.00071 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023
- OpenAlex
- W4378648223
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- software testing, software verification, software validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
