“Integrating an adjusted conversational agent into a mobile-assisted language learning application.”
Abstract
Conversational interfaces are used for a variety of applications. They are constructed to offer useful services and to interact with the users in order to assist them. Towards this direction, the current paper presents the incorporation of the interactive chatterbot ALICE in a mobile-assisted English language learning application. This chatterbot is further enriched with mechanisms in order to support students while learning vocabulary in English. As such, apart from making conversation with this conversational agent, they can practice their vocabulary or even be evaluated by the chatterbot. Hence, this study offers a fertile ground to enhance pedagogical results such as fostering motivation and engagement, incrementing crucial language learning and assisting in the acquisition of cognitive skills. Finally, the students can chat with the pedagogic conversational agent either orally or by writing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies developed chatbot systems and tested their impact on the language learning outcomes of K-12 students.
“All the aforementioned studies developed chatbot systems and tested their impact on the language learning outcomes of K-12 students.”
From Implementing the bashayer chatbot in Saudi higher education: measuring the influence on students' motivation and learning strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Troussas et al. (2017)
Cites
Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning
Elias, T. (2011) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.965 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
CSIEC: A computer assisted English learning chatbot based on textual knowledge and reasoning
Jia, J. (2009) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2008.09.001 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Freudbot: An Investigation of Chatbot Technology in Distance Education
Heller, B., Proctor, M., Mah, D., Jewell, L. M., & Cheung, B. (2005) · EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Study of the Application of a Keywords-based Chatbot System on the Teaching of Foreign LanguagesPreprint
Jia, J. (2003) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cs/0310018 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Educational Data Mining and Problem-Based Learning
Walldén, S., & Mäkinen, E. (2014) · Informatics in Education · doi:10.15388/infedu.2014.08 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Comulang: towards a collaborative e-learning system that supports student group modeling
Troussas, C., Virvou, M. K., & Alepis, E. (2013) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-387 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationTroussas, C., Virvou, M. K., & Espinosa, K. J. (2016) · Journal of Networks · doi:10.4304/jnw.10.12.668-674 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards a Game-Chatbot: Extending the Interaction in Serious Games
van Rosmalen, P., Eikelboom, J., Bloemers, E., Winzum, K. V., & Spronck, P. H. M. (2012) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Arabic Question-Answering via Instance Based Learning from an FAQ Corpus
Shawar, B. A., & Atwell, E. (2009) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Geranium System: Multimodal Conversational Agents for E-learning
Griol, D., Molina, J. M., & Sanchis, A. (2014) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07593-8_26 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mobile authoring in a multiple language learning environment
Troussas, C., Alepis, E., & Virvou, M. K. (2014) · doi:10.1109/iisa.2014.6878819 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationVirvou, M. K., Alepis, E., & Troussas, C. (2012) · Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, TAI · doi:10.1109/ictai.2012.154 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review
Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Ethical issues of the use of AI-driven mobile apps for education
Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., & Kacetl, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1118116 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111151 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Al-Abdullatif, A. M., Al-Dokhny, A. A., & Drwish, A. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129070 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Virvou, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Piraeus (GR)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-11
- Pages
- 1153-1157
- ISSN
- 1082-3409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807614947
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- chatbots, ALICE, mobile-assisted language learning, English vocabulary learning, vocabulary exercises, vocabulary assessment, student motivation, student engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review