Cited by 13Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSurface Treatment and Coatingsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Production of hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticle and HA/PCL tissue engineering scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

Hassan, Mohd Izzat, Mokhtar, Masturah, Sultana, Naznin, Khan, Tareef Hayat·2012·2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is biological apatite has close similarity of composition with human bone and teeth. Thus, it has been used in biomedical application in orthopedic and dentistry. The wet slurry of HA was successfully produced by mixing an acetone solution of calcium nitrate 4-hydrate with an aqueous solution of ammonium phosphate and ammonium carbonate with control pH of 11. The nano-emulsion was kept in freezer about one day and after that was kept in freeze drying machine about three days to obtain dry HA powder with low degree of agglomeration. The nanoparticles were studied under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Energy Dispersive Xray (EDX) showed the spectrum of elements in HA with Ca/P ratio close to biological bone. The polycaprolactone (PCL) and hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone (HA/PCL) composite scaffolds were produced using thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) technique. The scaffolds were studied under SEM and it was observed that both types of scaffolds had porous structures. The pore sizes of HA/PCL scaffold was slightly decreased compared to PCL scaffold. The HA nanoparticles were successfully produced and the PCL and HA/PCL scaffolds showed promises for bone tissue engineering application.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iecbes.2012.6498024

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Langer, 1993, Tissue engineering. Science, 260, 920

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Hassan, M. I., Mokhtar, M., Sultana, N., & Khan, T. H.
Affiliations
University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Venue
2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-12
Pages
239-242
OpenAlex
W2539154204
Cited by
13
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Surface Treatment and Coatings
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, polycaprolactone, bone tissue engineering, freeze-drying, thermally induced phase separation, porous scaffolds, pore size, calcium phosphate, nanoparticle agglomeration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review