The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-class filter bank common spatial pattern for four-class motor imagery BCI
Abstract
This paper investigates the classification of multi-class motor imagery for electroencephalogram (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) using the Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) algorithm. The FBCSP algorithm classifies EEG measurements from features constructed using subject-specific temporal-spatial filters. However, the FBCSP algorithm is limited to binary-class motor imagery. Hence, this paper proposes 3 approaches of multi-class extension to the FBCSP algorithm: One-versus-Rest, Pair-Wise and Divide-and-Conquer. These approaches decompose the multi-class problem into several binary-class problems. The study is conducted on the BCI Competition IV dataset IIa, which comprises single-trial EEG data from 9 subjects performing 4-class motor imagery of left-hand, right-hand, foot and tongue actions. The results showed that the multi-class FBCSP algorithm could extract features that matched neurophysiological knowledge, and yielded the best performance on the evaluation data compared to other international submissions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FBCSP is a widely used method to decode oscillatory EEG data, for example, with respect to movement-related information.
“FBCSP [Ang et al., 2008; Chin et al., 2009] is a widely used method to decode oscillatory EEG data, for example, with respect to movement‐related information, that is, the decoding problem we focus on in this study.”
From Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization (2017) · cites this paper as Chin et al., 2009
FBCSP was the best-performing method for the BCI competition IV dataset 2a.
“FBCSP was the best‐performing method for the BCI competition IV dataset 2a, which we use in this study”
From Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization (2017) · cites this paper as Chin et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis
Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., Kawanabe, M., & Muller, K.-R. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408441 · Cited by 2,080 · cited 2×
“Although a wideband of 8-30Hz was suggested [5], evidence showed that selecting subject-specific frequency bands could yield an improvement in the recognition rate of MI-BCI [ 8 ].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- blankertz, 2008, BCI Competition IV
- 10.1155/2007/39714 · DOI
- 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649325 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.patrec.2007.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.08.013 · DOI
- dornhege, 2004, Increase information transfer rates in BCI by CSP extension to multi-class, Proc Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 733
- 10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00038-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/86.895946 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TBME.2008.921154 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.01113.2002 · DOI
- 10.1109/TBME.2004.827088 · DOI
- 10.1145/1394622 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization
Schirrmeister, R. T., Springenberg, J. T., Fiederer, L. D. J., Glasstetter, M., Eggensperger, K., Tangermann, M., Hutter, F., Burgard, W., & Ball, T. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23730 · Cited by 3,751
Vahid, A., Mückschel, M., Stober, S., Stock, A.-K., & Beste, C. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0846-z · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Chin, Z. Y., Ang, K. K., Wang, C., Guan, C., & Zhang, H.
- Affiliations
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Venue
- 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 2009
- Pages
- 571-574
- ISSN
- 2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098391699
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- filter bank common spatial pattern, EEG-based brain-computer interface, multi-class classification, pairwise classification, divide-and-conquer, single-trial EEG, motor imagery classification
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Humans, Imagination, Motor Cortex, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Evoked Potentials, Motor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review