Recovery of neural activity from nerve cuff electrodes
Abstract
The ability to recover signals from the peripheral nerves would provide natural and physiological signals for controlling artificial limbs and neural prosthetic devices. Current cuff electrode systems can provide multiple channels but the signals have low signal to noise ratio and are difficult to recover. Previous work has shown that beamforming algorithms provide a method to extract such signals from peripheral nerve activiy [1]. This paper describes in-silico and in vivo experiments done to validate that method in a more realistic case. A modified beam forming algorithm capable of significantly decrease cross talk between channels is described and the results of the a 16-channel Flat Interface Nerve Electrode used to recover signals from the sciatic nerve in rabbit while the distal tibial and peroneal branches were stimulated The beamforming spatial filters were able to distinguish which branch was being stimulated, and in many cases how strongly, over a large range of stimulation intensities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wodlinger and Durand identified up to 5 individual fascicles using spatial filtering while recording nerve activity.
“Wodlinger and Durand identified up to 5 individual fascicles using spatial filtering while recording nerve activity (Wodlinger and Durand, 2011).”
From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Wodlinger and Durand, 2011
Cites
Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control
Rossini, P. M., Micera, S., Benvenuto, A., Carpaneto, J., Cavallo, G., Citi, L., Cipriani, C., Denaro, L., Denaro, V., Di Pino, G., et al. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.001 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thin film multi-electrode softening cuffs for selective neuromodulation
González-González, M. A., Kanneganti, A., Joshi-Imre, A., Hernandez-Reynoso, A. G., Bendale, G., Modi, R., Ecker, M., Khurram, A., Cogan, S. F., Voit, W. E., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34566-6 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
Rijnbeek, E. H., Eleveld, N., & Olthuis, W. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00350 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“Wodlinger and Durand identified up to 5 individual fascicles using spatial filtering while recording nerve activity (Wodlinger and Durand, 2011).”
- Authors
- Wodlinger, B., & Durand, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Venue
- 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 2011
- Pages
- 4653-4656
- ISSN
- 2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065177907
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS032845)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- cuff electrodes, beamforming, spatial filtering, crosstalk reduction, sciatic nerve, neuroprosthetics, signal-to-noise ratio
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Electrodes, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Rabbits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review