Cited by 13Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Recovery of neural activity from nerve cuff electrodes

Wodlinger, B., Durand, D. M.·2011·2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

Abstract

The ability to recover signals from the peripheral nerves would provide natural and physiological signals for controlling artificial limbs and neural prosthetic devices. Current cuff electrode systems can provide multiple channels but the signals have low signal to noise ratio and are difficult to recover. Previous work has shown that beamforming algorithms provide a method to extract such signals from peripheral nerve activiy [1]. This paper describes in-silico and in vivo experiments done to validate that method in a more realistic case. A modified beam forming algorithm capable of significantly decrease cross talk between channels is described and the results of the a 16-channel Flat Interface Nerve Electrode used to recover signals from the sciatic nerve in rabbit while the distal tibial and peroneal branches were stimulated The beamforming spatial filters were able to distinguish which branch was being stimulated, and in many cases how strongly, over a large range of stimulation intensities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iembs.2011.6091152

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wodlinger and Durand identified up to 5 individual fascicles using spatial filtering while recording nerve activity.

    “Wodlinger and Durand identified up to 5 individual fascicles using spatial filtering while recording nerve activity (Wodlinger and Durand, 2011).”

    From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Wodlinger and Durand, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wodlinger, B., & Durand, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-08
Volume
2011
Pages
4653-4656
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065177907
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS032845)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
cuff electrodes, beamforming, spatial filtering, crosstalk reduction, sciatic nerve, neuroprosthetics, signal-to-noise ratio
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Electrodes, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Rabbits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review