Cited by 97Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchConducting polymers and applications

Thin film multi-electrode softening cuffs for selective neuromodulation

Open access
González-González, María A., Kanneganti, Aswini, Joshi-Imre, Alexandra, Hernandez-Reynoso, Ana G., Bendale, Geetanjali, Modi, Romil, Ecker, Melanie, Khurram, Ali +3 more·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Silicone nerve cuff electrodes are commonly implanted on relatively large and accessible somatic nerves as peripheral neural interfaces. While these cuff electrodes are soft (1–50 MPa), their self-closing mechanism requires of thick walls (200–600 µm), which in turn contribute to fibrotic tissue growth around and inside the device, compromising the neural interface. We report the use of thiol-ene/acrylate shape memory polymer (SMP) for the fabrication of thin film multi-electrode softening cuffs (MSC). We fabricated multi-size MSC with eight titanium nitride (TiN) electrodes ranging from 1.35 to 13.95 × 10−4 cm 2 (1–3 kΩ) and eight smaller gold (Au) electrodes (3.3 × 10−5 cm 2; 750 kΩ), that soften at physiological conditions to a modulus of 550 MPa. While the SMP material is not as soft as silicone, the flexural forces of the SMP cuff are about 70–700 times lower in the MSC devices due to the 30 μm thick film compared to the 600 μm thick walls of the silicone cuffs. We demonstrated the efficacy of the MSC to record neural signals from rat sciatic and pelvic nerves (1000 µm and 200 µm diameter, respectively), and the selective fascicular stimulation by current steering. When implanted side-by-side and histologically compared 30 days thereafter, the MSC devices showed significantly less inflammation, indicated by a 70–80% reduction in ED1 positive macrophages, and 54–56% less fibrotic vimentin immunoreactivity. Together, the data supports the use of MSC as compliant and adaptable technology for the interfacing of somatic and autonomic peripheral nerves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-34566-6

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing electronics based on SMPs are not very compatible with traditional 2D planar processing, which limits the development of high-precision electronics.

    “By contrast, most of the existing electronics based on SMPs are not very compatible with traditional 2D planar processing, which limits the development of high-precision electronics (23, 25–28).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
González-González, M. A., Kanneganti, A., Joshi-Imre, A., Hernandez-Reynoso, A. G., Bendale, G., Modi, R., Ecker, M., Khurram, A., Cogan, S. F., Voit, W. E., & Romero-Ortega, M. I.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-11-06
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
16390-16390
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899504607
Cited by
97
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline foundation (1402127)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
Keywords
cuff electrodes, shape memory polymers, thin film electrodes, current steering, peripheral nerve interfaces, neural recording, sciatic nerve, pelvic nerve, fibrosis, inflammation, macrophages, vimentin, titanium nitride electrodes, gold electrode
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrochemistry, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Evoked Potentials, Female, Fibrosis, Sciatic Nerve, Silicones, Rats, Mechanical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review