Cited by 28Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchBayesian Methods and Mixture Models

Unsupervised classification of remotely sensed images using Gaussian mixture models and particle swarm optimization

Open access
Ari, Caglar, Aksoy, Selim·2010·2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium

Abstract

Gaussian mixture models (GMM) are widely used for unsupervised classification applications in remote sensing. Expectation-Maximization (EM) is the standard algorithm employed to estimate the parameters of these models. However, such iterative optimization methods can easily get trapped into local maxima. Researchers use population-based stochastic search algorithms to obtain better estimates. We present a novel particle swarm optimization-based algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of Gaussian mixture models. The proposed approach provides solutions for important problems in effective application of population-based algorithms to the clustering problem. We present a new parametrization for arbitrary covariance matrices that allows independent updating of individual parameters during the search process. We also describe an optimization formulation for identifying the correspondence relations between different parameter orderings of candidate solutions. Experiments on a hyperspectral image show better clustering results compared to the commonly used EM algorithm for estimating GMMs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/igarss.2010.5653855

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J. Edmonds and R. M. Karp, "Theoretical improve- ments in algorithmic efficiency for network flow prob- lems," Journal of the ACM, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 248-264, April 1972.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ari, C., & Aksoy, S.
Affiliations
Bilkent University (TR)
Venue
2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-07
Pages
1859-1862
OpenAlex
W2160550475
Cited by
28
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (publishedVersion)
  • Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Keywords
unsupervised classification, remote sensing image classification, Gaussian mixture model, particle swarm optimization, maximum likelihood estimation, expectation-maximization algorithm, local optima, hyperspectral imagery, clustering, population-based optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review