Unsupervised classification of remotely sensed images using Gaussian mixture models and particle swarm optimization
Open accessAbstract
Gaussian mixture models (GMM) are widely used for unsupervised classification applications in remote sensing. Expectation-Maximization (EM) is the standard algorithm employed to estimate the parameters of these models. However, such iterative optimization methods can easily get trapped into local maxima. Researchers use population-based stochastic search algorithms to obtain better estimates. We present a novel particle swarm optimization-based algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of Gaussian mixture models. The proposed approach provides solutions for important problems in effective application of population-based algorithms to the clustering problem. We present a new parametrization for arbitrary covariance matrices that allows independent updating of individual parameters during the search process. We also describe an optimization formulation for identifying the correspondence relations between different parameter orderings of candidate solutions. Experiments on a hyperspectral image show better clustering results compared to the commonly used EM algorithm for estimating GMMs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PSO utilizes the fitness function value to guide the search for optimality in the problem space rather than relying on derivative information (first and second order) to locate an optimal solution.
“PSO utilizes the fitness function value to guide the search for optimality in the problem space rather than relying on derivative information (first and second order) to locate an optimal solution [54].”
From A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Power System Stability, Control, and Protection: Insights and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505 · see citing works
Theoretical Improvements in Algorithmic Efficiency for Network Flow Problems
Edmonds, J., & Karp, R. M. (1972) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321694.321699 · Cited by 2,531 · see citing works
A genetic algorithm with gene rearrangement for K-means clustering
Chang, D., Zhang, X., & Zheng, C. (2008) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2008.11.006 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Maulik, U., & Saha, I. (2009) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.01.011 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Clustering of Hyperspectral Images Based on Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization
Paoli, A., Melgani, F., & Pasolli, E. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2009.2023666 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- J. Edmonds and R. M. Karp, "Theoretical improve- ments in algorithmic efficiency for network flow prob- lems," Journal of the ACM, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 248-264, April 1972.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alhamrouni, I., Abdul Kahar, N. H., Salem, M., Swadi, M., Zahroui, Y., Kadhim, D. J., Mohamed, F. A., & Alhuyi Nazari, M. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14146214 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ari, C., & Aksoy, S.
- Affiliations
- Bilkent University (TR)
- ORCID
- Aksoy, Selim
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-07
- Pages
- 1859-1862
- OpenAlex
- W2160550475
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (publishedVersion)
- Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
- Keywords
- unsupervised classification, remote sensing image classification, Gaussian mixture model, particle swarm optimization, maximum likelihood estimation, expectation-maximization algorithm, local optima, hyperspectral imagery, clustering, population-based optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review