Cited by 28Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDigital Media Forensic Detection

Semi-Targeted Model Poisoning Attack on Federated Learning via Backward Error Analysis

Open access
Sun, Yuwei, Ochiai, Hideya, Sakuma, Jun·2022·2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)

Abstract

Model poisoning attacks on federated learning intrude in the entire system via compromising an edge model, resulting in malfunctioning of machine learning models. Such compromised models are tampered with to perform adversary-desired behaviors. In particular, we considered a semi-targeted situation where the source class is predetermined however the target class is not. The goal is to cause the global classifier to misclassify data of the source class. Though approaches such as label flipping have been adopted to inject poisoned parameters into federated learning, it has been shown that their performances are usually class-sensitive varying with different target classes applied. Typically, an attack can become less effective when shifting to a different target class. To overcome this challenge, we propose the Attacking Distance-aware Attack (ADA) to enhance a poisoning attack by finding the optimized target class in the feature space. Moreover, we studied a more challenging situation where an adversary had limited prior knowledge about a client's data. To tackle this problem, ADA deduces pair-wise distances between different classes in the latent feature space from shared model parameters based on the backward error analysis. We performed extensive empirical evaluations on ADA by varying the factor of attacking frequency in three different image classification tasks. As a result, ADA succeeded in increasing the attack performance by 1.8 times in the most challenging case with an attacking frequency of 0.01.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9891990

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yuwei et al. proposed the attack distance-aware attack (ADA) to enhance poisoning attacks by finding optimal target classes in the feature space.

    “Yuwei et al. [24] proposed the attack distance-aware attack (ADA) to enhance poisoning attacks by finding optimal target classes in the feature space.”

    From Poisoning attacks in federated learning: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 28

Authors
Sun, Y., Ochiai, H., & Sakuma, J.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
Venue
2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-07-18
Pages
1-8
ISSN
2161-4407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312761046
Cited by
28
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • RIKEN AIP
  • JSPS KAKENHI (JP22J12681,JP19H04164)
  • JST CREST (JPMJCR21D3)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
model poisoning, federated learning, backward error analysis, label flipping, latent space, image classification, adversarial learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review