The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement and modelling of the temporal dependence in packet loss
Abstract
Understanding and modelling packet loss in the Internet is especially relevant for the design and analysis of delay-sensitive multimedia applications. We present analysis of 128 hours of end-to-end unicast and multicast packet loss measurement. From these we selected 76 hours of stationary traces for further analysis. We consider the dependence as seen in the autocorrelation function of the original loss data as well as the dependence between good run lengths and loss run lengths. The correlation timescale is found to be 1000 ms or less. We evaluate the accuracy of three models of increasing complexity: the Bernoulli model, the 2-state Markov chain model and the k-th order Markov chain model. Out of the 38 trace segments considered, the Bernoulli model was found to be accurate for 7 segments, and the 2-state model was found to be accurate for 10 segments. A Markov chain model of order 2 or greater was found to be necessary to accurately model the rest of the segments. For the case of adaptive applications which track loss, we address two issues of on-line loss estimation: the required memory size and whether to use exponential smoothing or a sliding window average to estimate average loss rate. We find that a large memory size is necessary and that the sliding window average provides a more accurate estimate for the same effective memory size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the constancy of internet path properties
Zhang, Y., & Duffield, N. (2001) · Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurement - IMW '01 · doi:10.1145/505202.505228 · Cited by 466
On multiple description streaming with content delivery networks
Apostolopoulos, J., Wong, T., Tan, W.-T., & Wee, S. (2003) · Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies · doi:10.1109/infcom.2002.1019427 · Cited by 323
Mac-layer packet loss models for wi-fi networks: A survey
Silva, C. A. G. D., & Pedroso, C. M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2958260 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Yajnik, M., Moon, S., Kurose, J., & Towsley, D.
- Venue
- IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 345-352 vol.1
- OpenAlex
- W2151927301
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.68
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement and modelling of the temporal dependence in packet loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/infcom.1999.749301
- The paper
- Yajnik, M., Moon, S., Kurose, J., & Towsley, D. (1999). Measurement and modelling of the temporal dependence in packet loss. IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320). https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.1999.749301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.