The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient content location using interest-based locality in peer-to-peer systems
Abstract
Locating content in decentralized peer-to-peer systems is a challenging problem. Gnutella, a popular file-sharing application, relies on flooding queries to all peers. Although flooding is simple and robust, it is not scalable. We explore how to retain the simplicity of Gnutella, while addressing its inherent weakness: scalability. We propose a content location solution in which peers loosely organize themselves into an interest-based structure on top of the existing Gnutella network. Our approach exploits a simple, yet powerful principle called interest-based locality, which posits that if a peer has a particular piece of content that one is interested in, it is very likely that it will have other items that one is interested in as well. When using our algorithm, called interest-based shortcuts, a significant amount of flooding can be avoided, making Gnutella a more competitive solution. In addition, shortcuts are modular and can be used to improve the performance of other content location mechanisms including distributed hash table schemes. We demonstrate the existence of interest-based locality in five diverse traces of content distribution applications, two of which are traces of popular peer-to-peer file-sharing applications. Simulation results show that interest-based shortcuts often resolve queries quickly in one peer-to-peer hop, while reducing the total load in the system by a factor of 3 to 7.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications
Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383071 · Cited by 9,623
Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems
Rowstron, A., & Druschel, P. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45518-3_18 · Cited by 7,276
A scalable content-addressable network
Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., & Shenker, S. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383072 · Cited by 6,372
GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994) · Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '94 · doi:10.1145/192844.192905 · Cited by 5,058
Tapestry: An Infrastructure for Fault-tolerant Wide-area Location and Routing
Zhao, B. Y., Kubiatowicz, J. D., & Joseph, A. D. (2001) · Cited by 2,146
A scalable content-addressable network
Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., & Shenker, S. (2001) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/964723.383072 · Cited by 1,799
Accessing nearby copies of replicated objects in a distributed environment
Plaxton, C. G., Rajaraman, R., & Richa, A. W. (1997) · Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures - SPAA '97 · doi:10.1145/258492.258523 · Cited by 760
Replication strategies in unstructured peer-to-peer networks
Cohen, E., & Shenker, S. J. (2002) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/633025.633043 · Cited by 683
On the scale and performance of cooperative Web proxy caching
Wolman, A., Voelker, M., Sharma, N., Cardwell, N., Karlin, A., & Levy, H. M. (1999) · Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/319151.319153 · Cited by 496
Cited by
Distributed and cloud computing: from parallel processing to the Internet of things
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5712 · Cited by 314
A survey on content-centric technologies for the current Internet: CDN and P2P solutions
Passarella, A. (2012) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2011.10.005 · Cited by 226
Understanding Human-Machine Networks: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey
Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Meyer, E. T., Pickering, J. B., Engen, V., Walland, P., Lüders, M., Følstad, A., & Bravos, G. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3039868 · Cited by 67
Power Law Distributions in Information Retrieval
Petersen, C., Simonsen, J. G., & Lioma, C. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2816815 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Sripanidkulchai, K., Maggs, B., & Zhang, H.
- Venue
- IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-03-02
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 2166-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2167414245
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 39.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient content location using interest-based locality in peer-to-peer systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/infcom.2003.1209237
- The paper
- Sripanidkulchai, K., Maggs, B., & Zhang, H. (2004). Efficient content location using interest-based locality in peer-to-peer systems. IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428). https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.2003.1209237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.