The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimal Jamming Attacks and Network Defense Policies in Wireless Sensor Networks
Abstract
We consider a scenario where a sophisticated jammer jams an area in a single-channel wireless sensor network. The jammer controls the probability of jamming and transmission range to cause maximal damage to the network in terms of corrupted communication links. The jammer action ceases when it is detected by a monitoring node in the network, and a notification message is transferred out of the jamming region. The jammer is detected at a monitor node by employing an optimal detection test based on the percentage of incurred collisions. On the other hand, the network computes channel access probability in an effort to minimize the jamming detection plus notification time. In order for the jammer to optimize its benefit, it needs to know the network channel access probability and number of neighbors of the monitor node. Accordingly, the network needs to know the jamming probability of the jammer. We study the idealized case of perfect knowledge by both the jammer and the network about the strategy of one another, and the case where the jammer or the network lack this knowledge. The latter is captured by formulating and solving optimization problems, the solutions of which constitute best responses of the attacker or the network to the worst-case strategy of each other. We also take into account potential energy constraints of the jammer and the network. We extend the problem to the case of multiple observers and adaptable jamming transmission range and propose a intuitive heuristic jamming strategy for that case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cyber security in the Smart Grid: Survey and challenges
Wang, W., & Lu, Z. (2013) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.017 · Cited by 1,123
Modeling, evaluation and detection of jamming attacks in time-critical wireless applications
Lu, Z., Wang, W., & Wang, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2013.146 · Cited by 117
Energy Depletion Attacks in Low Power Wireless Networks
Nguyen, V.-L., Lin, P.-C., & Hwang, R.-H. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2911424 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., Koutsopoulos, I., & Poovendran, R.
- Venue
- IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 1307-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2107831657
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Jamming Attacks and Network Defense Policies in Wireless Sensor Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/infcom.2007.155
- The paper
- Li, M., Koutsopoulos, I., & Poovendran, R. (2007). Optimal Jamming Attacks and Network Defense Policies in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.2007.155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.