Cited by 25IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EdgeSharing: Edge Assisted Real-time Localization and Object Sharing in Urban Streets

Liu, Luyang, Gruteser, Marco·2021·IEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications

Abstract

Collaborative object localization and sharing at smart intersections promises to improve situational awareness of traffic participants in key areas where hazards exist due to visual obstructions. By sharing a moving object's location between different camera-equipped devices, it effectively extends the vision of traffic participants beyond their field of view. However, accurately sharing objects between moving clients is extremely challenging due to the high accuracy requirements for localizing both the client position and positions of its detected objects. Therefore, we introduce EdgeSharing, a localization and object sharing system leveraging the resources of edge cloud platforms. EdgeSharing holds a real-time 3D feature map of its coverage region to provide accurate localization and object sharing service to the client devices passing through this region. We further propose several optimization techniques to increase the localization accuracy, reduce the bandwidth consumption and decrease the offloading latency of the system. The result shows that the system is able to achieve a mean vehicle localization error of 0.28-1.27 meters, an object sharing accuracy of 82.3%-91.4%, and a 54.7% object awareness increment in urban streets and intersections. In addition, the proposed optimization techniques reduce bandwidth consumption by 70.12% and end-to-end latency by 40.09%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/infocom42981.2021.9488830

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing edge SLAM systems that split the SLAM processing pipeline into a client and a server module lead to excessive communication latency because a huge amount of keyframes are determined and transmitted.

    “Our new edge-assisted SLAM architecture differs from existing edge SLAM systems that split the SLAM processing pipeline into a client and a server module [7], [8]. They lead to excessive communication latency since a huge amount of keyframes are determined and transmitted.”
  • Existing edge SLAM decomposition approaches are SLAM-specific, designed for a specific SLAM system.

    “In addition, these works are SLAM-specific, i.e., their decomposition approaches are designed for a specific SLAM system.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1109/INFOCOM.2017.8057096 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/3230543.3230574 · DOI · Paper page
  3. zhang, 2017, Live video analytics at scale with approximation and delay-tolerance, Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 377
  4. 10.1109/INFOCOM.2018.8485905 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1145/2500423.2504574 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/3356250.3360044 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/3365609.3365867 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.699 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1145/3210240.3210323 · DOI
  10. mur-artal, 2017, Orb-slam2: An open-source slam system for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33, 1255, 10.1109/TRO.2017.2705103 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/VNC.2012.6407443 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/MOCAST.2017.7937682 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/3132211.3134458 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1145/3210240.3210319 · DOI
  15. 10.23919/ICIF.2018.8455437 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/3210240.3210313 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/1023875.1023879 · DOI
  18. 10.1145/3177102.3177115 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2327587 · DOI
  20. bai, 2006, Reliability analysis of dsrc wireless communication for vehicle safety applications, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 355
  21. ahmad, 2020, Carmap: Fast 3d feature map updates for automobiles, 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ( NSDI 20), 1063
  22. 10.1145/3143361.3143381 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TVT.2016.2591558 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1145/2742647.2742657 · DOI
  25. 10.1561/1300000054 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/2742647.2742656 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600071CM · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, L., & Gruteser, M.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
IEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-05-10
Pages
1-10
OpenAlex
W3154365011
Cited by
25
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8
FWCI
4.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
edge computing, real-time localization, object sharing, smart intersections, urban streets, bandwidth reduction, offloading latency, vehicle localization, visual obstruction, situational awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review