The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EdgeSharing: Edge Assisted Real-time Localization and Object Sharing in Urban Streets
Abstract
Collaborative object localization and sharing at smart intersections promises to improve situational awareness of traffic participants in key areas where hazards exist due to visual obstructions. By sharing a moving object's location between different camera-equipped devices, it effectively extends the vision of traffic participants beyond their field of view. However, accurately sharing objects between moving clients is extremely challenging due to the high accuracy requirements for localizing both the client position and positions of its detected objects. Therefore, we introduce EdgeSharing, a localization and object sharing system leveraging the resources of edge cloud platforms. EdgeSharing holds a real-time 3D feature map of its coverage region to provide accurate localization and object sharing service to the client devices passing through this region. We further propose several optimization techniques to increase the localization accuracy, reduce the bandwidth consumption and decrease the offloading latency of the system. The result shows that the system is able to achieve a mean vehicle localization error of 0.28-1.27 meters, an object sharing accuracy of 82.3%-91.4%, and a 54.7% object awareness increment in urban streets and intersections. In addition, the proposed optimization techniques reduce bandwidth consumption by 70.12% and end-to-end latency by 40.09%.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing edge SLAM systems that split the SLAM processing pipeline into a client and a server module lead to excessive communication latency because a huge amount of keyframes are determined and transmitted.
“Our new edge-assisted SLAM architecture differs from existing edge SLAM systems that split the SLAM processing pipeline into a client and a server module [7], [8]. They lead to excessive communication latency since a huge amount of keyframes are determined and transmitted.”
From Orchestrating Joint Offloading and Scheduling for Low-Latency Edge SLAM (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Existing edge SLAM decomposition approaches are SLAM-specific, designed for a specific SLAM system.
“In addition, these works are SLAM-specific, i.e., their decomposition approaches are designed for a specific SLAM system.”
From Orchestrating Joint Offloading and Scheduling for Low-Latency Edge SLAM (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
LSD-SLAM: Large-scale direct monocular SLAM
Engel, J., Schöps, T., & Cremers, D. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10605-2_54 · Cited by 3,851
CARLA: An open urban driving simulator
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.03938 · Cited by 3,718
Deep Ordinal Regression Network for Monocular Depth Estimation
Fu, H., Gong, M., Wang, C., Batmanghelich, K., & Tao, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00214 · Cited by 1,991
Edge Assisted Real-time Object Detection for Mobile Augmented Reality
Liu, L., Li, H., & Gruteser, M. (2019) · The 25th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking · doi:10.1145/3300061.3300116 · Cited by 552
Self-citationOptimizing 360 video delivery over cellular networks
Qian, F., Ji, L., Han, B., & Gopalakrishnan, V. (2016) · Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on All Things Cellular: Operations, Applications and Challenges · doi:10.1145/2980055.2980056 · Cited by 402
LAVEA: latency-aware video analytics on edge computing platform
Yi, S., Hao, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Shi, W., & Li, Q. (2017) · Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing · doi:10.1145/3132211.3134459 · Cited by 244
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1109/INFOCOM.2017.8057096 · DOI
- 10.1145/3230543.3230574 · DOI · Paper page
- zhang, 2017, Live video analytics at scale with approximation and delay-tolerance, Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 377
- 10.1109/INFOCOM.2018.8485905 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2500423.2504574 · DOI
- 10.1145/3356250.3360044 · DOI
- 10.1145/3365609.3365867 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.699 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3210240.3210323 · DOI
- mur-artal, 2017, Orb-slam2: An open-source slam system for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33, 1255, 10.1109/TRO.2017.2705103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/VNC.2012.6407443 · DOI
- 10.1109/MOCAST.2017.7937682 · DOI
- 10.1145/3132211.3134458 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3210240.3210319 · DOI
- 10.23919/ICIF.2018.8455437 · DOI
- 10.1145/3210240.3210313 · DOI
- 10.1145/1023875.1023879 · DOI
- 10.1145/3177102.3177115 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2327587 · DOI
- bai, 2006, Reliability analysis of dsrc wireless communication for vehicle safety applications, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 355
- ahmad, 2020, Carmap: Fast 3d feature map updates for automobiles, 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ( NSDI 20), 1063
- 10.1145/3143361.3143381 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2016.2591558 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2742647.2742657 · DOI
- 10.1561/1300000054 · DOI
- 10.1145/2742647.2742656 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600071CM · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Orchestrating Joint Offloading and Scheduling for Low-Latency Edge SLAM
Zhang, Y., Mao, Y., Wang, H., Yu, Z., Guo, S., Zhang, J., Wang, L., & Guo, B. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3547256 · Cited by 1
“This has motivated recent investigations into the realm of edge-assisted SLAM, such as [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, L., & Gruteser, M.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- IEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-05-10
- Pages
- 1-10
- OpenAlex
- W3154365011
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Keywords
- edge computing, real-time localization, object sharing, smart intersections, urban streets, bandwidth reduction, offloading latency, vehicle localization, visual obstruction, situational awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review