Cited by 6,898Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageAdvanced Vision and Imaging

ORB-SLAM2: An Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo, and RGB-D Cameras

Open access
Mur-Artal, Raul, Tardos, Juan D.·2017·IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Abstract

We present ORB-SLAM2, a complete simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) system for monocular, stereo and RGB-D cameras, including map reuse, loop closing, and relocalization capabilities. The system works in real time on standard central processing units in a wide variety of environments from small hand-held indoors sequences, to drones flying in industrial environments and cars driving around a city. Our back-end, based on bundle adjustment with monocular and stereo observations, allows for accurate trajectory estimation with metric scale. Our system includes a lightweight localization mode that leverages visual odometry tracks for unmapped regions and matches with map points that allow for zero-drift localization. The evaluation on 29 popular public sequences shows that our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, being in most cases the most accurate SLAM solution. We publish the source code, not only for the benefit of the SLAM community, but with the aim of being an out-of-the-box SLAM solution for researchers in other fields.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tro.2017.2705103

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stochastic input sequences of edge-assisted SLAM cause a considerable impact on state dynamics and rewards, which incurs high variance during the training of policy gradient methods.

    “As an input-driven system, the stochastic input sequences of edge-assisted SLAM cause a considerable impact on the state dynamics and rewards, which then incur high variance during the training of policy gradient methods [13], [14].”

    From Orchestrating Joint Offloading and Scheduling for Low-Latency Edge SLAM (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Evaluation section (p. 6) mentions nondeterminism from multithreading and reports repeating each sequence to assess trajectory accuracy. Our copy does not address edge-assisted SLAM input sequences, state dynamics or rewards, or variance in policy-gradient training (searched for those terms and related phrasing). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Traditional state-dependent DRL algorithms suffer from high state dynamics, leading to inherent bias in policy gradient estimates and increased gradient variance during training.

    “In such an input-driven system, traditional state-dependent DRL algorithms suffer from high state dynamics, leading to inherent bias in policy gradient estimates and increased gradient variance during training [13], [14].”

    From Orchestrating Joint Offloading and Scheduling for Low-Latency Edge SLAM (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The ORB-SLAM2 section (p. 4) describes camera tracking, mapping, and loop closing; the bundle-adjustment section (p. 5) describes optimization of camera poses and map points. Searches for state-dependent DRL, policy-gradient bias, and gradient variance found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12][12] T. Whelan, M. Kaess, H. Johannsson, M. Fallon, J. J. Leonard, and J. McDonald, 'Real-time large-scale dense RGB-D SLAM with volumetric fusion,' Int. J. Robot. Res. , vol. 34, no. 4-5, pp. 598-626, 2015. -
  2. [19][19] R. Kuemmerle, G. Grisetti, H. Strasdat, K. Konolige, and W. Burgard, 'g2o: A general framework for graph optimization,' in IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot. and Autom. (ICRA) , 2011, pp. 3607-3613. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mur-Artal, R., & Tardos, J. D.
Affiliations
Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Published
2017-10
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1255-1262
ISSN
  • 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0468
OpenAlex
W2535547924
Cited by
6,898
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 521 · 2025: 851 · 2024: 944 · 2023: 962 · 2022: 910 · 2021: 870 · 2020: 754 · 2019: 636 · 2018: 360 · 2017: 90
FWCI
463.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Spanish government (DPI2015-67275)
  • Aragón regional government (DGA T04-FSE)
  • Ministerio de Educación Scholarship (FPU13/04175)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
ORB-SLAM2, SLAM, monocular SLAM, stereo SLAM, RGB-D SLAM, loop closure, relocalization, bundle adjustment, visual odometry, trajectory estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review