Cited by 11UAV Applications and OptimizationIoT Networks and ProtocolsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Employing Intelligent Aerial Data Aggregators for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Solutions

Open access
Li, Kai, Ni, Wei, Noor, Alam, Guizani, Mohsen·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Magazine

Abstract

Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices equipped with temperature and humidity sensors and cameras are increasingly deployed to monitor remote and human-unfriendly areas (e.g., farmlands, forests, rural highways, and electricity infrastructures). Aerial data aggregators such as autonomous drones provide a promising solution for collecting sensory data of IoT devices in human-unfriendly environments, enhancing network scalability and connectivity. The flexibility of a drone and favorable line-of-sight connection between the drone and IoT devices can be exploited to improve data reception at the drone. This article first discusses challenges of the drone-assisted data aggregation in IoT networks, such as incomplete network knowledge at the drone, limited buffers of the IoT devices, and lossy wireless channels. Next, we investigate the feasibility of onboard deep-reinforcement-learning-based solutions to allow a drone to learn its cruise control and data collection schedule online. For deep reinforcement learning in a continuous operation domain, deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) is suitable to deliver effective joint cruise control and communication decision, using its outdated knowledge of the IoT devices and network states. A case study shows that the DDPG-based framework can take advantage of the continuous actions to substantially outperform existing non-learning-based alternatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iotm.001.2100161

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, K., Ni, W., Noor, A., & Guizani, M.
Affiliations
  • Real-Time and Embedded Computing Systems Research Centre,Portugal
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Qatar University (QA)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Magazine
Published
2022-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
136-141
ISSN
  • 2576-3180 (ISSN-L)
  • 2576-3199
OpenAlex
W4280601641
Cited by
11
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
FCT
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
Internet of Things, autonomous drones, deep reinforcement learning, deep deterministic policy gradient, cruise control, data collection scheduling, remote area monitoring, temperature and humidity sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review