The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A scheme for robust distributed sensor fusion based on average consensus
Abstract
We consider a network of distributed sensors, where where each sensor takes a linear measurement of some unknown parameters, corrupted by independent Gaussian noises. We propose a simple distributed iterative scheme, based on distributed average consensus in the network, to compute the maximum-likelihood estimate of the parameters. This scheme doesn't involve explicit point-to-point message passing or routing; instead, it diffuses information across the network by updating each node's data with a weighted average of its neighbors' data (they maintain the same data structure). At each step, every node can compute a local weighted least-squares estimate, which converges to the global maximum-likelihood solution. This scheme is robust to unreliable communication links. We show that it works in a network with dynamically changing topology, provided that the infinitely occurring communication graphs are jointly connected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Distributed optimization in sensor networks
Rabbat, M., & Nowak, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks · doi:10.1145/984622.984626 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522
Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control
(2007) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2007.338264 · Cited by 3,156
Incremental Adaptive Strategies Over Distributed Networks
Lopes, C. G., & Sayed, A. H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2007.896034 · Cited by 732
Consensus in Ad Hoc WSNs With Noisy Links—Part I: Distributed Estimation of Deterministic Signals
Schizas, I. D., Ribeiro, A., & Giannakis, G. B. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2007.906734 · Cited by 685
Fast Distributed Gradient Methods
Jakovetic, D., Xavier, J., & Moura, J. M. F. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2298712 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, L., Boyd, S., & Lall, S.
- Venue
- IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005-06-15
- Pages
- 63-70
- OpenAlex
- W4244375620
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A scheme for robust distributed sensor fusion based on average consensus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ipsn.2005.1440896
- The paper
- Xiao, L., Boyd, S., & Lall, S. (2005). A scheme for robust distributed sensor fusion based on average consensus. IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ipsn.2005.1440896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.