The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
A Novel Perceptive Robotic Cane with Haptic Navigation for Enabling Vision-Independent Participation in the Social Dynamics of Seat Choice
Abstract
Goal-based navigation in public places is critical for independent mobility and for breaking barriers that exist for blind or visually impaired (BVI) people in a sight-centric society. Through this work we present a proof-of-concept system that autonomously leverages goal-based navigation assistance and perception to identify socially preferred seats and safely guide its user towards them in unknown indoor environments. The robotic system includes a camera, an IMU, vibrational motors, and a white cane, powered via a backpack-mounted laptop. The system combines techniques from computer vision, robotics, and motion planning with insights from psychology to perform 1) SLAM and object localization, 2) goal disambiguation and scoring, and 3) path planning and guidance. We introduce a novel 2-motor haptic feedback system on the cane's grip for navigation assistance. Through a pilot user study we show that the system is successful in classifying and providing haptic navigation guidance to socially preferred seats, while optimizing for users' convenience, privacy, and intimacy in addition to increasing their confidence in independent navigation. The implications are encouraging as this technology, with careful design guided by the BVI community, can be adopted and further developed to be used with medical devices enabling the BVI population to better independently engage in socially dynamic situations like seat choice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finding a preferred seat can also be difficult for BLV people [1, 14]”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Finding a preferred seat can also be difficult for BLV people [1, 14] and will be particularly relevant in the entry phase of the trip given shared mobility concepts for AVs that include multi-passenger shuttles (e.g., at airports).”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“This echoes evidence that perceptual cues often outperform verbal instructions for layout and orientation tasks [1, 10].”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989772 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00331 · DOI
- 10.3390/s19153404 · DOI
- 10.1145/3308561.3353771 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561786 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2800665 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/scirobotics.abg6594 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICMU.2014.6799060 · DOI
- 10.1109/I2CACIS.2016.7885319 · DOI
- 10.1109/SII.2012.6426936 · DOI
- Sakhardande, 2012, Smart cane assisted mobility for the visually impaired, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 6, 1262
- 10.1109/IHTC.2014.7147543 · DOI
- Wahab, 2011, Smart cane: Assistive cane for visually-impaired people
- 10.1108/SR-04-2020-0097 · DOI
- 10.1109/GCCE.2014.7031333 · DOI
- 10.1109/CYBER.2017.8446303 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341789 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6224690 · DOI
- 10.1145/3373625.3417004 · DOI
- 10.1109/3468.911370 · DOI
- 10.1109/THMS.2019.2931745 · DOI
- 10.1109/R10-HTC.2016.7906791 · DOI
- 10.1068/p2873 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364911406761 · DOI
- 10.1007/bf02344692 · DOI
- 10.1145/2661334.2661380 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10514-016-9595-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10209-020-00712-z · DOI
- 10.1080/10400435.2014.926468 · DOI
- 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347031 · DOI
- 10.1145/2559206.2581244 · DOI
- 10.1177/1948550614559650 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
D. S. Fink, P., R Brown, J., M Movalia, R., J James, K., E Kastelein, M., Bond, J., E Andrulis, M., & A Giudice, N. (2026) · Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798714
Metadata
- Authors
- Agrawal, S., West, M. E., & Hayes, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-10-23
- Pages
- 9156-9163
- ISSN
- 2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312852749
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF (1830686)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Keywords
- haptic navigation, blind and visually impaired people, independent mobility, SLAM, object localization, path planning, user study, assistive robotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review