The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology
Abstract
Automated detection and segmentation of nuclear and glandular structures is critical for classification and grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology. In this paper, we present a methodology for automated detection and segmentation of structures of interest in digitized histopathology images. The scheme integrates image information from across three different scales: (1) low- level information based on pixel values, (2) high-level information based on relationships between pixels for object detection, and (3) domain-specific information based on relationships between histological structures. Low-level information is utilized by a Bayesian classifier to generate a likelihood that each pixel belongs to an object of interest. High-level information is extracted in two ways: (i) by a level-set algorithm, where a contour is evolved in the likelihood scenes generated by the Bayesian classifier to identify object boundaries, and (ii) by a template matching algorithm, where shape models are used to identify glands and nuclei from the low-level likelihood scenes. Structural constraints are imposed via domain- specific knowledge in order to verify whether the detected objects do indeed belong to structures of interest. In this paper we demonstrate the utility of our glandular and nuclear segmentation algorithm in accurate extraction of various morphological and nuclear features for automated grading of (a) prostate cancer, (b) breast cancer, and (c) distinguishing between cancerous and benign breast histology specimens. The efficacy of our segmentation algorithm is evaluated by comparing breast and prostate cancer grading and benign vs. cancer discrimination accuracies with corresponding accuracies obtained via manual detection and segmentation of glands and nuclei.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bloom, H. J. G., & Richardson, W. W. (1957) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1957.43 · Cited by 2,925
Level Set Evolution without Re-Initialization: A New Variational Formulation
Li, C., Xu, C., Gui, C., & Fox, M. D. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.213 · Cited by 1,783
Petushi, S., Garcia, F. U., Haber, M. M., Katsinis, C., & Tozeren, A. (2006) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/1471-2342-6-14 · Cited by 245
AUTOMATED GRADING OF PROSTATE CANCER USING ARCHITECTURAL AND TEXTURAL IMAGE FEATURES
Doyle, S., Hwang, M., Shah, K., Madabhushi, A., Feldman, M., & Tomaszeweski, J. (2007) · 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro · doi:10.1109/isbi.2007.357094 · Cited by 230
Self-citationUnsupervised cell nucleus segmentation with active contours
Bamford, P., & Lovell, B. (1998) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/s0165-1684(98)00145-5 · Cited by 224
Cited by
MultiResUNet : Rethinking the U-Net architecture for multimodal biomedical image segmentation
Ibtehaz, N., & Rahman, M. S. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.025 · Cited by 2,311
Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review
Gurcan, M. N., Boucheron, L. E., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N. M., & Yener, B. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2034865 · Cited by 2,052
Self-citationPredicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks
Mobadersany, P., Yousefi, S., Amgad, M., Gutman, D. A., Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Velázquez Vega, J. E., Brat, D. J., & Cooper, L. A. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717139115 · Cited by 1,084
Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Analysis: A Review
Veta, M., Pluim, J. P. W., van Diest, P. J., & Viergever, M. A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2303852 · Cited by 696
Cruz-Roa, A., Basavanhally, A., González, F., Gilmore, H., Feldman, M., Ganesan, S., Shih, N., Tomaszewski, J., & Madabhushi, A. (2014) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.2043872 · Cited by 573
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Naik, S., Doyle, S., Agner, S., Madabhushi, A., Feldman, M., & Tomaszewski, J.
- Venue
- 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-05
- Pages
- 284-287
- OpenAlex
- W2134993189
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/isbi.2008.4540988
- The paper
- Naik, S., Doyle, S., Agner, S., Madabhushi, A., Feldman, M., & Tomaszewski, J. (2008). Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology. 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi.2008.4540988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.