The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background: Tumor classification is inexact and largely dependent on the qualitative pathological examination of the images of the tumor tissue slides. In this study, our aim was to develop an automated computational method to classify Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections based on cancer tissue texture features. Methods: Image processing of histology slide images was used to detect and identify adipose tissue, extracellular matrix, morphologically distinct cell nuclei types, and the tubular architecture. The texture parameters derived from image analysis were then applied to classify images in a supervised classification scheme using histologic grade of a testing set as guidance. Results: The histologic grade assigned by pathologists to invasive breast carcinoma images strongly correlated with both the presence and extent of cell nuclei with dispersed chromatin and the architecture, specifically the extent of presence of tubular cross sections. The two parameters that differentiated tumor grade found in this study were (1) the number density of cell nuclei with dispersed chromatin and (2) the number density of tubular cross sections identified through image processing as white blobs that were surrounded by a continuous string of cell nuclei. Classification based on subdivisions of a whole slide image containing a high concentration of cancer cell nuclei consistently agreed with the grade classification of the entire slide. Conclusion: The automated image analysis and classification presented in this study demonstrate the feasibility of developing clinically relevant classification of histology images based on micro- texture. This method provides pathologists an invaluable quantitative tool for evaluation of the components of the Nottingham system for breast tumor grading and avoid intra-observer variability thus increasing the consistency of the decision-making process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review
Gurcan, M. N., Boucheron, L. E., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N. M., & Yener, B. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2034865 · Cited by 2,052
Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) for Nuclei Detection on Breast Cancer Histopathology Images
Xu, J., Xiang, L., Liu, Q., Gilmore, H., Wu, J., Tang, J., & Madabhushi, A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2458702 · Cited by 854
Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Analysis: A Review
Veta, M., Pluim, J. P. W., van Diest, P. J., & Viergever, M. A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2303852 · Cited by 696
Cruz-Roa, A., Basavanhally, A., González, F., Gilmore, H., Feldman, M., Ganesan, S., Shih, N., Tomaszewski, J., & Madabhushi, A. (2014) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.2043872 · Cited by 573
Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology
Naik, S., Doyle, S., Agner, S., Madabhushi, A., Feldman, M., & Tomaszewski, J. (2008) · 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro · doi:10.1109/isbi.2008.4540988 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Petushi, S., Garcia, F. U., Haber, M. M., Katsinis, C., & Tozeren, A.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-14
- ISSN
- 1471-2342 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1516417927
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2342-6-14
- The paper
- Petushi, S., Garcia, F. U., Haber, M. M., Katsinis, C., & Tozeren, A. (2006). Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer. BMC Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-6-14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.