Cited by 29COVID-19 diagnosis using AIDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Targeted Self Supervision For Classification On A Small Covid-19 Ct Scan Dataset

Ewen, Nicolas, Khan, Naimul·2021·2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Abstract

Traditionally, convolutional neural networks need large amounts of data labelled by humans to train. Self supervision has been proposed as a method of dealing with small amounts of labelled data. The aim of this study is to determine whether self supervision can increase classification performance on a small COVID-19 CT scan dataset. This study also aims to determine whether the proposed self supervision strategy, targeted self supervision, is a viable option for a COVID-19 imaging dataset. A total of 10 experiments are run comparing the classification performance of the proposed method of self supervision with different amounts of data. The experiments run with the proposed self supervision strategy perform significantly better than their non-self supervised counterparts. We get almost 6% increase on average with self supervision compared to no self supervision, and more than 8% increase in accuracy in our best run with self supervision when compared to no self supervision. The results suggest that self supervision can improve classification performance on a small COVID-19 CT scan dataset. Code for targeted self supervision can be found at this link: https://github.com/Mewtwo/Targeted-SelfSupervision/tree/main/COVID-CT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9434047

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nine of the innate relationship studies designed their pre-text task based on different image transformations, including rotation prediction, horizontal flip prediction, reordering shuffled slices, and patch order prediction.

    “Nine of these studies designed their innate relationship pre-text task based on different image transformations, including rotation prediction44–47, horizontal flip prediction48, reordering shuffled slices49, and patch order prediction46,50–52.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewen, N., & Khan, N.
Affiliations
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Venue
2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-04-13
Pages
1481-1485
OpenAlex
W3164251887
Cited by
29
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12
FWCI
8.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
self-supervised learning, COVID-19 pandemic, CT scan classification, convolutional neural networks, medical image classification, data augmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review