Cited by 31Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

N-HAR: A Neuromorphic Event-Based Human Activity Recognition System using Memory Surfaces

Pradhan, Bibrat Ranjan, Bethi, Yeshwanth, Narayanan, Sathyaprakash, Chakraborty, Anirban, Thakur, Chetan Singh·2019·2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)

Abstract

In recent years, a new generation of low-power, neuromorphic, event-based vision sensors has been gaining popularity for their very low latency and data sparsity. Though the conventional frame-based cameras have advanced in a lot of ways, they suffer from data redundancy and temporal latency. The bio-inspired artificial retinas eliminate the data redundancy by capturing only the change in illumination at each pixel and asynchronously communicating in binary spikes. In this work, we propose a system to achieve the task of human activity recognition based on the event-based camera data. We show that such tasks, which generally need high frame rate sensors for accurate predictions, can be achieved by adapting existing computer vision techniques to the spiking domain. We used event memory surfaces to make the sparse event data compatible with deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We leverage upon the recent advances in deep convolutional networks based video analysis and adapt such frameworks onto the neuromorphic domain. We also provide the community with a new dataset consisting of five categories of human activities captured in real world without any simulations. We achieved an accuracy of 94.3% using event memory surfaces on our activity recognition dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iscas.2019.8702581

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Event-ReId-v2 demonstrates a favorable size relative to existing event-based datasets, notably n-HAR, DailyAction-DVS, and DHP19.

    “Our proposed dataset demonstrates a favorable size relative to existing event-based datasets, notably in the domain of activity recognition n-HAR [16] and DailyAction-DVS [17], and human pose estimation dataset DHP19 [2] (see comparisons in Table 1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pradhan, B. R., Bethi, Y., Narayanan, S., Chakraborty, A., & Thakur, C. S.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Venue
2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
1-5
ISSN
0271-4302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2942896434
Cited by
31
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
human activity recognition, event cameras, spiking neural networks, event-based vision, convolutional neural networks, activity recognition dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review