Charge Balance Circuit for Constant Current Neural Stimulation with Less than 8 nC Residual Charge
Open accessAbstract
Charge balancing is a major concern in functional electrical stimulation. Any excess charge accumulation over time leads to electrolysis with the electrode dissolution and tissue destruction. Therefore, charge balance circuits are used for mitigating the effects of charge accumulation in tissues. This work introduces an active synchronous charge balance circuit for constant current neural stimulators that operates without requiring negative supply for remaining charge detection. The charge balance circuit detects the residual charge by monitoring the electrode voltages just before the stimulation. If the voltage difference between the electrodes is above a certain threshold, a balance current is generated to achieve net zero charge at the electrode. Balancing current and the main stimulation current are injected simultaneously, preventing any interference in other electrodes. The charge balance circuit is dynamically disabled to reduce the system power when the charge detection is not active. The circuit can operate for the stimulation currents up to 1.4 mA and hold the electrode charge under 8 nC/phase while consuming only 6.36 μW power.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The exact limit for safe injected residual charge varies in the literature.
“The exact limit for safe injected residual charge varies in the literature [124], [125].”
From Active Neural Interface Circuits and Systems for Selective Control of Peripheral Nerves: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [124]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Yigit, H. A., Ulusan, H., Chamanian, S., & Kulah, H.
- Affiliations
- Middle East Technical University (TR)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-05
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 0271-4302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2943819001
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings (publishedVersion)
- OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
- Keywords
- residual charge, electrolysis, electrode dissolution, implantable neural stimulator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review