An effective Stackelberg game for high-assurance of data trustworthiness in WSNs
Abstract
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) security plays an intrinsic role to guarantee efficient data transmission, stable network topologies, and robust routing algorithms. In this paper, we propose a modified Stackelberg game of a previous work for high assurance of data trustworthiness in a Power Grid Network (PGN). The proposed approach is presented to mitigate a more severe attack scenario compared to that considered in the previous work; this attack scenario frequently manipulates sets of the deployed nodes in the PGN, which cannot be treated using the previously proposed approach. Our proposed scheme reduces the required number of nodes to be protected to achieve the desired data trustworthiness. Simulation results prove efficient detection for corrupted transmitted data based on limited number of nodes as compared to the previously proposed approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IDS sees the game between attackers and defenders for IoT and WSN as being simulated either via their interaction or the use of an attacker's forecasting approach.
“IDS sees the game between attackers and defenders for IoT and WSN as being simulated either via their interaction or the use of an attacker's forecasting approach [13] [12] [14] [15].”
From Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection Systems and Machine Learning Based Model Analysis through Decision Tree (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Wireless sensor networks: a survey
Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(01)00302-4 · Cited by 17,523 · see citing works
Game theory in wireless and communication networks: theory, models, and applications
Han, Z. (2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6929 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Wireless sensor networks: applications and challenges of ubiquitous sensing
Puccinelli, D., & Haenggi, M. (2005) · IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcas.2005.1507522 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Khan, A. A., Rehmani, M. H., & Martin Reisslein, B. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2481722 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
A survey on wireless sensor networks for smart grid
Fadel, E. A., Güngör, V. Ç., Nassef, L., Akkari, N., Malik, M. G. A., Almasri, S., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2015) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2015.09.006 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Packet Size Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks for Smart Grid Applications
Kurt, S., Yıldız, H. U., Yiğit, M., et al. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2619319 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Provenance-based trustworthiness assessment in sensor networks
Lim, H.-S., Moon, Y., & Bertino, E. (2010) · doi:10.1145/1858158.1858162 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
A Survey of Clock Synchronization Over Packet-Switched Networks
Lévesque, M., & Tipper, D. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2590438 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Game Theory Meets Wireless Sensor Networks Security Requirements and Threats Mitigation: A Survey
Abdalzaher, M. S., Seddik, K. G., Elsabrouty, M. M., et al. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16071003 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationA Survey of Game Theory in Wireless Sensor Networks Security
Shen, S., Yue, G., Cao, Q., & Yu, F. R. (2011) · Journal of Networks · doi:10.4304/jnw.6.3.521-532 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
QoE-Aware Power Management in Vehicle-to-Grid Networks: A Matching-Theoretic Approach
Zeng, M., Leng, S., Zhang, K., & He, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2613546 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
A Game-Theoretic Approach for High-Assurance of Data Trustworthiness in Sensor Networks
Lim, H.-S., Ghinita, G., Bertino, E., et al. (2012) · Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2012.78 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Using Stackelberg game to enhance cognitive radio sensor networks security
Abdalzaher, M. S., Seddik, K. G., & Muta, O. (2017) · IET Communications · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2016.1336 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing repeated game for maximizing high priority data trustworthiness in Wireless Sensor Networks
Abdalzaher, M. S., Seddik, K. G., & Muta, O. (2017) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications/IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications · doi:10.1109/iscc.2017.8024586 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing Stackelberg game to enhance node protection in WSNs
Abdalzaher, M. S., Seddik, K. G., Muta, O., et al. (2016) · IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2016.7444900 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationJoint estimation-detection of cyber attacks in smart grids: Bayesian and non-Bayesian formulations
Gaber, A., Seddik, K. G., & Elezabi, A. Y. (2015) · IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2015.7127816 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationA pricing-based cooperative spectrum sharing stackelberg game
Ali, R. E., Seddik, K. G., Nafie, M., et al. (2014) · International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt) · doi:10.1109/wiopt.2014.6850303 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Azam, Z., Islam, M. M., & Huda, M. N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3296444 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
A Game-Theoretic Approach for Enhancing Security and Data Trustworthiness in IoT Applications
Abdalzaher, M. S., & Muta, O. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2996671 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Abdalzaher, M. S., Seddik, K., & Muta, O.
- Affiliations
- National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (EG)
- American University in Cairo (EG)
- Kyushu University (JP)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 1257-1262
- ISSN
- 1530-1346 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753323091
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
- Keywords
- Stackelberg game, wireless sensor networks, data trustworthiness, power grid, malicious node detection, game-theoretic security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
