Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44Educational Robotics and EngineeringTeaching and Learning ProgrammingArt Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arts & Bots: Techniques for distributing a STEAM robotics program through K-12 classrooms

Hamner, E., Cross, J.·2013·2013 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)
DOI 10.1109/isecon.2013.6525207
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Arts & Bots is a craft-based robotics program focused on expression and creativity in the service of improving K-12 student technological fluency. In this paper, we describe how we transitioned Arts & Bots from an out-of-school program to a successful classroom tool applicable to many school subjects. We focus specifically on partnerships with teachers and professional development strategies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isecon.2013.6525207

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 2011, AP Computer Science Principles Curriculum Framework Learning Objectives and Evidence Statements
  2. 2010, Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
  3. 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630613 · DOI
  4. 1999, Being Fluent with Information Technology
  5. schoenberg, 2001, The Girl Difference Short-Circuiting the Myth of the Technophobic Girl
  6. 10.1109/MRA.2008.931646 · DOI
  7. hamner, 2010, The debugging task: Evaluating a robotics design workshop, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Educational Robotics and Beyond Design and Evaluation, 20
  8. bernstein, 2010, Developing technological fluency through creative robotics (Doctoral dissertation), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
  9. 2012, Competition-VEX-VEX Robotics
  10. hamner, 2008, Robot diaries interim project report Development of a technology program for middle school girls
  11. hamner, 2008, Robot diaries: Broadening participation in the computer science pipeline through social technical exploration, Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science, 38

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Hamner, E., & Cross, J.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
ORCID
Cross, J.
Venue
2013 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-03
Pages
1-5
DOI
10.1109/isecon.2013.6525207
OpenAlex
W2002376476
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Robotics and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
Keywords
STEAM education, K-12 classrooms, technological fluency, out-of-school time programs, teacher partnerships, professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arts & Bots: Techniques for distributing a STEAM robotics program through K-12 classrooms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/isecon.2013.6525207
The paper
Hamner, E., & Cross, J. (2013). Arts & Bots: Techniques for distributing a STEAM robotics program through K-12 classrooms. 2013 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). https://doi.org/10.1109/isecon.2013.6525207