Mobile phone take back learning's from various initiatives
Abstract
Takeback of obsolete electronics products has been in the focus of the environmental discussions for nearly 10 years. The European Union has published the WEEE directive which is implemented now in nearly all EU27 countries. In addition to The EU, the State of California has passed similar legislation with 34 additional states considering take back legislation. The trend continues in Canada, China and Latin America. The driving force for this is the increasing amount of consumer electronic products in the world and the desire to direct those products at the end of life to responsible recycling instead of landfill. Mobile phones are rich in metals and other natural resources allowing for economically viable recycling capturing resources such as gold, platinum, palladium and copper. One of the bottlenecks in the recycling chain has been the low return rates of the used products at the end of useful life. Consumers tend to want to keep the old products or are unaware of the take back vehicles available to them. This paper presents case studies from two countries where a variety of take back initiatives for mobile phones are in place. Raising awareness and providing easy take back options are explored as key factors in increasing the return rate of used electronics devices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inadequate WEEE collection and disposal have resulted in the loss of valuable materials and simultaneously exerted pressure on the exploitation of raw materials.
“Despite the potential negative impact of informal recycling on human and environmental health, inadequate WEEE collection and disposal have resulted in the loss of valuable materials and simultaneously exerted pressure on the exploitation of raw materials [40].”
From Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
Electrical applications accounted for approximately 70% of the copper produced globally.
“For example, electrical applications accounted for approximately 70% of the copper produced globally.”
From Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greening academia: use and disposal of mobile phones among university students
Ongondo, F. O., & Williams, I. D. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.031 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos
Soudachanh, S., & Salhofer, S. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17020711 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tanskanen, P., & Butler, E.
- Affiliations
- Nokia (Finland) (FI)
- Nokia (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Tanskanen, Pia
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007-05
- Pages
- 206-209
- ISSN
- 1095-2020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019051438
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (ISEE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- electronic waste, WEEE directive, consumer awareness, return rate, used electronics, precious metal recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review