The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conducting on-line surveys in software engineering
Open accessAbstract
One purpose of empirical software engineering is to enable an understanding of factors that influence software development. Surveys are an appropriate empirical strategy to gather data from a large population (e.g., about methods, tools, developers, companies) and to achieve an understanding of that population. Although surveys are quite often performed, for example, in social sciences and marketing research, they are underrepresented in empirical software engineering research, which most often uses controlled experiments and case studies. Consequently, also the methodological support how to perform such studies in software engineering is rather low. However, with the increasing pervasion of the Internet it is possible to perform surveys easily and cost-effectively over Internet pages (i.e., on-line), while at the same time the interest in performing surveys is growing. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First we want to arise the awareness of on-line surveys and discuss methods how to perform these in the context of software engineering. Second, we report our experience in performing on-line surveys in the form of lessons learned and guidelines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to Boehm [44], complexity is one of the important drivers in software cost.”
From A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 1992, The Experimental Paradigm in Software Engineering, Collection of Position Papers of International Workshop on Experimental Software Engineering Issues
- shannon, 0, Using electronic surveys: advice from survey professionals, Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 8
- oppenheim, 1992, Questionnaire design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement
- fowler, 1995, Improving survey questions - design and evaluation, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
- solomon, 0, Conducting web-based surveys, Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 7
- 10.1007/978-3-642-59463-2 · DOI
- dillman, 2001, The Web Questionnaire Challenge to Survey Methodologists, Dimensions of Internet Science
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3304-4 · DOI
- fenton, 1996, Software Metrics - A Rigorous Approach
- freimut, 2002, State of the art in Empirical Studies, ViSEK Report 007/02/IESE Report, Kaiserslautern, Fraunhofer IESE
- wohlin, 2000, Experimentation in Software Engineering - An Introduction, The Kluwer International Series in Software Engineering, 10.1007/978-1-4615-4625-2 · DOI
- wohlin, 2001, Survey of Experimental Methods in Software Engineering, D2 1 of IST 2000–28754 Project ESERNET
- zendler, 2001, A Preliminary Software Engineering Theory as Investigated by Published Experiments. Empirical Software Engineering, An International Journal, 6, 161
- 10.1109/32.799955 · DOI
- sommerville, 1996, Software Engineering 5th Edition
- kitchenham, 2001, Principles of Survey Research - series of 6 articles, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 26
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data scientists in software teams: State of the art and challenges
Kim, M., Zimmermann, T., DeLine, R., & Begel, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2017.2754374 · Cited by 199
Today was a good day: The daily life of software developers
Meyer, A. N., Barr, E. T., Bird, C., & Zimmermann, T. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2019.2904957 · Cited by 123
Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers
Liang, W., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., Lepp, H., Ji, W., Zhao, X., Cao, H., Liu, S., He, S., Huang, Z., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.01268 · Cited by 55
On the Presence of Green and Sustainable Software Engineering in Higher Education Curricula
Torre, D., Procaccianti, G., Fucci, D., Lutovac, S., & Scanniello, G. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering Curricula for Millennials (SECM) · doi:10.1109/secm.2017.4 · Cited by 39
A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering
Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3253145 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Punter, T., Ciolkowski, M., Freimut, B., & John, I.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (DE)
- ORCID
- Ciolkowski, M.
- Venue
- 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2003. ISESE 2003. Proceedings.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 80-88
- OpenAlex
- W2142759419
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- online surveys, survey methodology, empirical software engineering, online data collection, lessons learned
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review