The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combining SCADA, CIM, GridLab-D and AKKA for smart grid co-simulation
Abstract
Smart energy systems are a promising choice for countries worldwide to handle the challenges predicted in the next decades. With the will to participate in this development technology providers create a plethora of custom system solutions. While traditional equipment can be evaluated using power system simulations, the impact of components with complex communication and responsive behavior is hard to measure and evaluate. In this work we introduce a co-simulation framework, which is developed to analyse properties of custom smart grid solutions. We combine classical power system simulations, reactive smart grid components coupled to actors and use CIM as an intermediate model. Our actor connection to SCADA allows to efficiently run large-scale co-simulation experiments to evaluate the behavior of custom components under real environment or duplicate real systems to analyse scalability and emergent properties of new solutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SCADASiM is an integrated framework for control system simulation presented by Mahoney and Gandhi.
“An integrated framework for control system simulation, SCADASiM is presented by Mahoney and Gandhi in [9].”
From Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1109/ISGT.2011.5759166 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873129 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0218126603000751 · DOI
- andersson, 2004, Modelling and analysis of electric power systems, EEH-Power Systems Laboratory Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820691 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSE.2012.64 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jss.2011.01.004 · DOI
- kob, 2012, Establishing a smart grid node architecture and demonstrator in an office environment using the soa approach, Software Engineering for the Smart Grid (SE4SG) 2012 International Workshop On IEEE, 8
- 10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622057 · DOI
- 10.1109/SURV.2011.101911.00087 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques
Nazir, S., Patel, S., & Patel, D. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.06.010 · Cited by 167
“A co-simulation framework is proposed by Bytschkow et al. [50] using Common information model (CIM) as an intermediate model.”
MethodHybrid Cloud – Architecture for Administration Shells with RAMI4.0 Using Actor4j
Bauer, D. A., & Mäkiö, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) · doi:10.1109/indin41052.2019.8972075 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Bytschkow, D., Zellner, M., & Duchon, M.
- Affiliations
- Fortiss (DE)
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-02
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W1597528819
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Systems and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Modeling and Simulation Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Keywords
- smart grid, co-simulation, SCADA, Common Information Model, GridLAB-D, Akka, power system simulation, component evaluation, scalability, emergent behavior, actor-based modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
