Cited by 8Digital Transformation in IndustryIndustrial Automation and Control SystemsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Hybrid Cloud – Architecture for Administration Shells with RAMI4.0 Using Actor4j

Bauer, David Alessandro, Mäkiö, Juho·2019·2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)

Abstract

In this paper, the actor-oriented Java framework Actor4j is used to implement administration shells in a RAMI4.0 context to enable the implementation of hybrid cloud solutions. A novel architecture is conceptualized around the usage of the Actor Model, especially in the area of edge and cloud computing. The administration shell can be either implemented by an asset that is OPC-UA ready or be mapped to a gateway in the device (service) cloud. The administration shell implemented with the Actor Model (predominantly for the public and private cloud) consists of four modules: the components module (describing the corresponding system), the publish-subscribe module, the additional logic module (conditions, alarms), and the interaction module (behavior). The main idea is to reuse an OPC-UA compliant implementation for the internal actor logic. At the device cloud level, IT/OT entities can be composed together in a domain specific point of view. This is implemented over three abstractions levels (data acquisition, data analytics and control & monitoring). The proposed Actor Model fits very well for the implementation of large scale administrations shells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/indin41052.2019.8972075

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seif, Toro and Akhtar presented a use case of AAS modeling to adopt devices that are not compliant with the I4.0 component by parsing a comma-separated file and creating a submodel serialized in JSON (or XML) format.

    “Seif, Toro and Akhtar [125] presented a use case of AAS mod-eling to adopt devices that are not compliant with the I4.0 component by parsing a comma-separated file (containing the device definition and characterization) and creating a submodel serialized in JSON (or XML) format.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, D. A., & Mäkiö, J.
Affiliations
University of Applied Sciences Emden Leer (DE)
Venue
2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Pages
79-86
ISSN
1935-4576 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003516133
Cited by
8
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (publishedVersion)
  • Hochschulschriftenserver der Hochschule Emden/Leer (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
hybrid cloud, RAMI 4.0, actor model, OPC UA, edge computing, cloud computing, publish/subscribe, Industrial Internet of Things, IT-OT integration, data acquisition, data analytics, monitoring and control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review