The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coded computation over heterogeneous clusters
Open accessAbstract
In large-scale distributed computing clusters, such as Amazon EC2, there are several types of “system noise” that can result in major degradation of performance: system failures, bottlenecks due to limited communication bandwidth, latency due to straggler nodes, and so on. There have been recent results that demonstrate the impact of coding for efficient utilization of computation and storage redundancy to alleviate the effect of stragglers and communication bottlenecks in homogeneous clusters. In this paper, we focus on general heterogeneous distributed computing clusters consist of a variety of computing machines with different capabilities. We propose a coding framework for speeding up distributed computing in heterogeneous clusters by trading redundancy for reducing the latency of computation. In particular, we propose heterogeneous coded matrix multiplication (HCMM) algorithm for performing distributed matrix multiplication over heterogeneous clusters that are provably asymptotically optimal for a broad class of processing time distributions. Moreover, we show that HCMM is unboundedly faster than any uncoded scheme that partitions the total workload among the workers. To demonstrate how the proposed HCMM scheme can be applied in practice, we provide results from numerical studies and Amazon EC2 experiments comparing HCMM with three benchmark load allocation schemes-uniform uncoded, load-balanced uncoded, and uniform coded. In particular, in our numerical studies, HCMM achieves speedups of up to 73%, 56%, and 42%, respectively, over the three benchmark schemes mentioned earlier. Furthermore, we carry out experiments over Amazon EC2 clusters and demonstrate how HCMM can be combined with rateless codes with nearly linear decoding complexity. In particular, we show that HCMM combined with the Luby transform codes can significantly reduce the overall execution time. HCMM is found to be up to 61%, 46%, and 36% faster than the aforementioned three benchmark schemes, respectively. Additionally, we provide a generalization to the problem of optimal load allocation in heterogeneous settings, where we take into account the monetary costs associated with distributed computing clusters. We argue that HCMM is asymptotically optimal for budget-constrained scenarios as well. In particular, we characterize the minimum possible expected cost associated with a computation task over a given cluster of machines. Furthermore, we develop a heuristic algorithm for (HCMM) load allocation for the distributed implementation of budget-limited computation tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244
Dean, J., & Barroso, L. A. (2013) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2408776.2408794 · Cited by 1,852
Speeding Up Distributed Machine Learning Using Codes
Lee, K., Lam, M., Pedarsani, R., Papailiopoulos, D., & Ramchandran, K. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2017.2736066 · Cited by 829
Self-citationLow Latency Geo-distributed Data Analytics
Pu, Q., Ananthanarayanan, G., Bodik, P., Kandula, S., Akella, A., Bahl, P., & Stoica, I. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication · doi:10.1145/2785956.2787505 · Cited by 246
Cited by
A survey on federated learning
Zhang, C., Xie, Y., Bai, H., Yu, B., Li, W., & Gao, Y. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106775 · Cited by 1,899
Speeding Up Distributed Machine Learning Using Codes
Lee, K., Lam, M., Pedarsani, R., Papailiopoulos, D., & Ramchandran, K. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2017.2736066 · Cited by 829
Self-citationJoint Device Scheduling and Resource Allocation for Latency Constrained Wireless Federated Learning
Shi, W., Zhou, S., Niu, Z., Jiang, M., & Geng, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2020.3025446 · Cited by 381
On the Optimal Recovery Threshold of Coded Matrix Multiplication
Dutta, S., Fahim, M., Haddadpour, F., Jeong, H., Cadambe, V., & Grover, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2019.2929328 · Cited by 282
Handling privacy-sensitive medical data with federated learning: Challenges and future directions
Aouedi, O., Sacco, A., Piamrat, K., & Marchetto, G. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3185673 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Reisizadeh, A., Prakash, S., Pedarsani, R., & Avestimehr, S.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2408-2412
- OpenAlex
- W2582482048
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coded computation over heterogeneous clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/isit.2017.8006961
- The paper
- Reisizadeh, A., Prakash, S., Pedarsani, R., & Avestimehr, S. (2017). Coded computation over heterogeneous clusters. 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). https://doi.org/10.1109/isit.2017.8006961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.