Cited by 168Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

Handling privacy-sensitive medical data with federated learning: Challenges and future directions

Open access
Aouedi, Ons, Sacco, Alessio, Piamrat, Kandaraj, Marchetto, Guido·2023·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Recent medical applications are largely dominated by the application of Machine Learning (ML) models to assist expert decisions, leading to disruptive innovations in radiology, pathology, genomics, and hence modern healthcare systems in general. Despite the profitable usage of AI-based algorithms, these data-driven methods are facing issues such as the scarcity and privacy of user data, as well as the difficulty of institutions exchanging medical information. With insufficient data, ML is prevented from reaching its full potential, which is only possible if the database consists of the full spectrum of possible anatomies, pathologies, and input data types. To solve these issues, Federated Learning (FL) appeared as a valuable approach in the medical field, allowing patient data to stay where it is generated. Since an FL setting allows many clients to collaboratively train a model while keeping training data decentralized, it can protect privacy-sensitive medical data. However, FL is still unable to deliver all its promises and meets the more stringent requirements (e.g., latency, security) of a healthcare system based on multiple Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). For example, although no data are shared among the participants by definition in FL systems, some security risks are still present and can be considered as vulnerabilities from multiple aspects. This paper sheds light upon the emerging deployment of FL, provides a broad overview of current approaches and existing challenges, and outlines several directions of future work that are relevant to solving existing problems in federated healthcare, with a particular focus on security and privacy issues.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys federated learning (FL) for privacy-sensitive medical data and the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), covering applications, security/privacy countermeasures, and open challenges. It argues FL can protect patient data while enabling collaboration, but practical issues such as non-IID data, communication overhead, stragglers, and constrained devices remain unresolved.

Key findings

  • FL enables collaborative model training while keeping patient data local; a general FL-trained model can achieve performance comparable to centrally hosted datasets and superior to models trained on isolated single-institutional data.
  • Reviewed IoMT/healthcare applications include electronic health record patient similarity, hospitalization prediction, activity recognition, teledermatology, COVID-19 detection, and drug discovery (the Melloddy project applies multi-task FL to datasets from 10 pharmaceutical companies).
  • Reported quantitative results include: IID data difference between FL and non-FL within 3%; PerFit accuracy 11.12% higher than classical FL; non-IID data caused up to 50% accuracy reduction; Federated Dropout reduced local computations by 1.7× without affecting accuracy; compression reduced communication costs by two orders of magnitude.
  • Security and privacy risks remain despite FL, including gradient-based reconstruction, model inversion, and adversarial attacks; countermeasures include secure aggregation, differential privacy, blockchain, and homomorphic encryption, with trade-offs between security and model accuracy or system efficiency.

Methods

  • Narrative review/survey design; no primary experiments or new dataset are collected.
  • Synthesizes existing literature on FL concepts, IoMT applications, security/privacy concerns, and practical challenges.
  • Uses summary tables (Table I on related reviews; Table II on FL-IoMT approaches) and discusses representative works across healthcare and IoMT scenarios.

Limitations

  • The paper does not explicitly state limitations of its own review.
  • Evident from the text: as a survey, it provides no new experimental validation; performance numbers are drawn from cited studies.
  • Evident from the text: no systematic search protocol, inclusion criteria, or meta-analysis are described.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3185673

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 99 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    The majority of works on FL-IoMT have considered the CNN model and its variations, such as ResNet and VGG.

    “Furthermore, as shown in Table II, the majority of the works have considered the CNN model and its variations, such as ResNet and VGG.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § A. Federated Transfer Learning

    The accuracy of PerFit is 11.12% higher than that of classical FL.

    “The results show that the accuracy of PerFit is 11.12% higher than that of classical FL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § C. FL for COVID-19

    FL can achieve comparable performance to methods without FL under different settings (training data size, number of clients, IID/Non-IID, balanced/unbalanced) without sacrificing the privacy of end-users.

    “The experimental results demonstrate that FL can achieve comparable performance to the methods without FL under these settings without sacrificing the privacy of the end-users.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    Transferring knowledge in a distributed healthcare system provides a high-quality personalized model.

    “Also, based on [43], transferring the knowledge in distributed healthcare system provides a high-quality personalized model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisereasoning
    § Security problem (data and model manipulation):

    Privacy problems arise when vulnerabilities cause user data leakage, weakening the basics of federated learning designed for privacy preservation across multi-device machine learning.

    “Privacy problem: This type of problem, even more severe than the security one, arises when vulnerabilities cause user data leakage, as it weakens the basics of FL that are designed explicitly for privacy preservation across multi-device ML.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 87
  • May combine two claims. 74
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § B. Contribution

    No existing work extensively reviews the use of FL in IoMT networks and applications.

    “Although FL has been well studied in different domains, to the best of our knowledge, no existing work extensively reviews the use of FL in IoMT networks and applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § II. FEDERATED LEARNING CONCEPTS

    A general FL-trained model can achieve performance levels comparable to models trained on centrally hosted datasets and superior to models that only see isolated single-institutional data.

    “Independently of the FL training strategy, a recent analysis for the medical field has shown that a general FL-trained model can achieve performance levels comparable to the ones trained on centrally hosted datasets and superior to models that only see isolated single-institutional data [27], [28].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § I. INTRODUCTION

    Federated learning enables collaborative training of a global model over a decentralized network via local updates, without exchanging private data, thereby keeping data local and preserving privacy.

    “With FL, a global model is trained collaboratively by each agent of the system (e.g., hospitals, IoMTs, or health care centers) over the decentralized network.This is done via local updates, without exchanging private data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    FL requires computationally robust devices.

    “FL also requires computationally robust devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    FL improves patient privacy and reduces low latency during the collaboration of multiple hospitals or entities.

    “It also improves patient privacy and reduces low latency during the collaboration of multiple hospitals/entities [7].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Federated Transfer Learning

    The TFL framework increases the classification time.

    “It also shows that the TFL framework increases the classification time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Federated Transfer Learning

    FedHealth can improve classification performance compared to the non-federated model and the traditional machine learning model.

    “The experiment results demonstrate that FedHealth can improve the classification performance compared to the non-federated model and the traditional machine learning model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § IV. SECURITY AND PRIVACY CONCERNS

    Although FL provides privacy-preservation by allowing clients to keep data local, there are still model security and data leakage risks that would compromise the security of the FL system and the data privacy of clients.

    “Although FL is the enabling technology in this scenario and provides a privacy-preservation capability by allowing the clients to keep the data on local devices, there are still model security and data leakage risks that would compromise the security of the FL system and the data privacy of clients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Security problems in FL are primarily caused by curious or malicious attackers targeting vulnerabilities of the FL system, which can lead to significant performance drop and sometimes model invalidation.
    • Rests on an assumption: In healthcare and IoMT scenarios, an attacker can directly manipulate the model and data of a local affiliation, resulting in a malicious update of the global model or mislabeled data.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    FL has made a huge contribution to the fight against COVID-19 without sharing patient data.

    “Moreover, recently FL has made a huge contribution to the fight against COVID-19 without sharing patient data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § III. FL FOR INTERNET OF MEDICAL THINGS

    When the training data is IID, the difference between FL and non-FL is within 3%.

    “Also, the authors showed that when the training data is IID, the difference between FL and non-FL is within 3%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § III. FL FOR INTERNET OF MEDICAL THINGS

    Human activity recognition with semi-supervised FL is not affected by non-IID data and can achieve comparable accuracy to supervised FL.

    “Their experimental results show that human activity recognition with semi-supervised FL is not affected by the non-IID data and can achieve comparable accuracy to that of the supervised FL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Zhao, 2020, Semi-supervised federated learning for activity recognition

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § III. FL FOR INTERNET OF MEDICAL THINGS

    FL requires less communication and computational resources while using less complex models, but at the cost of lower accuracy.

    “Then, they study the trade-off between the communication cost and the model accuracy, which indicates that FL requires less communication and computational resources while using less complex models but at the cost of lower accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Federated Transfer Learning

    FTL outperforms the non-TFL approach in terms of the Area Under The Curve (AUC) metric and maintains the same accuracy.

    “The results demonstrate that the FTL outperforms the non-TFL approach in terms of the Area Under The Curve (AUC) metric and maintains the same accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    FL plays an important role in facilitating healthcare services.

    “From the presented state-of-the-art on FL-IoMT, we can notice that FL plays an important role in facilitating healthcare services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    Some IoMT devices offload their model training task to edge gateways, helping the FL training process take advantage of cloud and edge computing, and using IoMT devices as simple data collectors.

    “For this reason, some IoMT devices offload their model training task to the edge gateways; therefore, helping the FL training process to take advantage of the cloud and edge computing, and using the IoMT devices as simple data collectors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § D. Summary and Discussion

    FL requires less communication overhead, and hence it can replace traditional learning approaches in IoMT applications.

    “It can be learned from [37] that FL requires less communication overhead, and hence it can replace traditional learning approaches in IoMT applications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § III. FL FOR INTERNET OF MEDICAL THINGS

    The shared global model trained on the FL server fails in personalization due to different characteristics or daily activity patterns of users; hence, it is important to have a fine-grained or personalized model.

    “Although the efficiency of FL application for healthcare systems, the shared global model trained on the FL server fails in personalization due to the different characteristics or daily activity patterns of users; hence, it is important to have a fine-grained or personalized model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § IV. SECURITY AND PRIVACY CONCERNS

    FL can play a significant role in various industry domains that involve sensitive personal data, such as IoMT for healthcare.

    “Since federated learning comes with a privacy-preserving attribute, it can play a significant role in various industry domains that involve sensitive personal data, such as IoMT for healthcare.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Medical data is highly sensitive and must be protected by appropriate confidentiality procedures.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Security problem (data and model manipulation):

    Federated learning still suffers from information leakage issues and, having multiple parties, extends the attack surface.

    “FL, despite a different training process compared to traditional ML, still suffers from information leakage issues and, having multiple parties, extends the attack surface.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § II. FEDERATED LEARNING CONCEPTS

    FL solves the problem of having inadequate data by providing a trust factor between heterogeneous domains.

    “For example, along with the data privacy and delocalization problems, FL also solves the problem of having inadequate data by providing a trust factor between heterogeneous domains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. FL With Cloud-Edge Architecture

    Edge computing helps to train the model closer to end-users and may conduct inference much faster than in the cloud.

    “As shown in Fig. 2, edge computing helps to train the model closer to the endusers and hence may conduct inference much faster than in the cloud [46].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. FL for COVID-19

    ResNet-18 has the best performance in training both with FL and without FL approaches, while ResNeXt shows the highest efficiency on images with COVID-19 labels.

    “The experimental results show that ResNet-18 has the best performance in training both with FL and without FL approaches, while ResNeXt shows the highest efficiency on images with COVID-19 labels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Security problem (data and model manipulation):

    In IoMT applications, intercepted data could be a patient's personal or healthcare information, which presents a severe ethical problem.

    “In IoMT applications, the intercepted data could be a patient's personal or healthcare information, which presents a severe ethical problem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § II. FEDERATED LEARNING CONCEPTS

    FL provides a highly trained ML model without the risk of exposing training data since the data are kept where they are generated.

    “It provides a highly trained ML model without the risk of exposing training data since they are kept where they are generated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. FL With Cloud-Edge Architecture

    Edge computing is an efficient solution to address the limited hardware of IoMT devices and reduce network congestion and latency that occur with the cloud.

    “It is an efficient solution to address these issues and reduce the network congestion and latency that occur with the cloud.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. FL With Cloud-Edge Architecture

    The FedHome framework is effective in terms of accuracy, computation, and communication overhead.

    “The experimental results on human activity recognition demonstrate the effectiveness of the FedHome framework in terms of accuracy, computation, and communication overhead.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Federated Transfer Learning

    Transfer learning avoids learning from scratch and solves the problem of insufficient training data, and can be effective in healthcare scenarios.

    “As a result, the recent technique of transfer learning, which avoids learning from scratch and solves the problem of insufficient training data, can be effective in this scenario [42].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § III. FL FOR INTERNET OF MEDICAL THINGS

    The proposed model in [35] converges faster and with less communication overhead compared to an alternative distributed algorithm.

    “The theoretical and experimental comparisons show that the proposed model converges faster and with less communication overhead compared to an alternative distributed algorithm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    Some clients may deliberately try to extract information from other parties, degrade performance, or bring the system down.

    “Some clients, for example, may deliberately try to extract information from other parties, degrade performance, or bring the system down.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    While standards are necessary for security and privacy purposes, they can make sharing and using health data challenging.

    “While standards are necessary for security and privacy purposes, they can make sharing and using health data challenging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    Operating FL systems at a larger scale might make collaborative agreements impractical, so it is more reasonable not to have trustworthiness assumptions.

    “However, operating FL systems on a larger scale might be impractical to establish collaborative agreements and it is more reasonable not to have trustworthiness assumptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    For FL consortia in which all parties are bounded by an enforceable collaboration agreement, some nefarious motivations can be disregarded.

    “For FL consortia in which all parties are bounded by an enforceable collaboration agreement, we can disregard some of the more nefarious motivations, such as deliberated attempts to extract sensitive information or to intentionally corrupt the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    Precious data often remain confined to individual institutions and are rarely leveraged for analysis, hindering the application of deep learning algorithms in healthcare.

    “In view of the above arguments, precious data often remain confined to individual institutions and are rarely leveraged for analysis, hindering the application of deep learning algorithms in healthcare.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Security problem (data and model manipulation):

    The model can be manipulated by attackers inducing additional memorization through gradient-ascent-style attacks.

    “Besides, the model can be manipulated by attackers inducing additional memorization through gradient-ascent-style attacks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    Personal health information is highly sensitive, containing diagnostic and healthcare related information and identifiable details about individuals.

    “In fact, personal health information is considered to be highly sensitive, containing not only diagnostic and healthcare related information but also identifiable details about individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Bonawitz et al. introduce a secure aggregation protocol for protecting individual model updates.

    “Bonawitz et al. [62] introduce a secure aggregation protocol for protecting individual model updates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    The applied secure aggregation is a lossless method that can retain the original accuracy with a very high privacy guarantee.

    “The applied secure aggregation is a lossless method that can retain the original accuracy with a very high privacy guarantee.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    Some sophisticated countermeasures can be avoided if all parties are deemed trustworthy.

    “At the same time, it can be noted how some sophisticated countermeasures can be avoided if all parties are deemed trustworthy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    Privacy problems are exacerbated in medical companies by strict laws and regulations designed to prevent re-identification and data breaches.

    “Lastly, privacy problems are exacerbated in medical companies by strict laws and regulations designed to prevent the risk of re-identification and data breaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    If standards are respected, FL can foster the application of deep learning in digital health and healthcare informatics, making it possible to use existing health datasets while protecting user privacy.

    “If these standards are respected, FL can foster the application of deep learning in digital health and healthcare informatics, making it possible the use of existing health datasets while protecting user privacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § TABLE II OVERVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES ON FEDERATED LEARNING WITH IOMT

    Data privacy is one of the public's most important concerns because data breaches can result in reduced public trust.

    “Even from the consumer perspective, data privacy is one of the public's most important concerns because data breaches can result in reduced public trust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Data breaches can result in reduced public trust.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    In Bonawitz et al.'s secure aggregation solution, the central server cannot see local updates but can observe the exact aggregated results at each round.

    “In this solution, the central server is not able to see any local updates, but it can still observe the exact aggregated results at each round.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Li et al. introduced locally differentially private algorithms in the context of meta-learning while providing provable learning guarantees in convex settings.

    “Li et al. [65] introduced locally differentially private algorithms in the context of meta-learning while providing provable learning guarantees in convex settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] Li, 2019, Differentially private meta-learning

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Deployment of FL on blockchain technology can establish data security and eliminate trust issues.

    “Another approach to establish data security and eliminate the trust issues is the deployment of FL on blockchain technology [71]- [73].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [71] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [72] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [73] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    The differential privacy approach comes with many hyperparameters that need careful selection and affect communication and accuracy.

    “This type of approach comes with a considerable number of hyperparameters that need to be carefully selected and that affect communication and accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] McMahan, 2017, Learning differentially private recurrent language models

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    PRCL reduces local training overhead by outsourcing the middle part to the cloud server while providing similar accuracy to other state-of-the-art approaches.

    “The simulation results show that PRCL reduces the local training overhead because outsourcing the middle part to the cloud server while providing similar accuracy to other state-of-the-art approaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    When a client's trust value is lower than 60%, the request from this client will be prohibited.

    “If lower the respective target values, the lower the trust value of the client, and when such a trust value is lower than 60%, the request from this client will be prohibited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Bhowmick et al. proposed a relaxed version of local privacy by limiting the power of potential adversaries.

    “For stronger privacy guarantees, Bhowmick et al. [64] have proposed a relaxed version of local privacy by limiting the power of potential adversaries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Bhowmick, 2018, Protection against reconstruction and its applications in private federated learning

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    A blockchain-based verification scheme can improve the reliability of the federated training process.

    “In addition, the blockchain-based verification scheme can also improve the reliability of the federated training process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    EPPDA preserves user privacy, requires less computing and communication resources than alternatives such as [62], and provides acceptable fault tolerance in the event of user disconnection.

    “Adopting the homomorphisms of secret sharing, it preserves user privacy and requires less computing and communication resources than alternatives as [62], and is able to provide acceptable fault tolerance in the event of user disconnection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [69] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [62] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    In PRCL, confidentiality is preserved because the cloud cannot access the plaintext gradient and an attacker can only get the perturbed data due to the added noise.

    “At the same time, confidentiality is preserved since the cloud cannot access the plaintext gradient and an attacker can only get the perturbed data due to the added noise.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Bhowmick et al.'s relaxed local privacy provides stronger guarantees than global privacy and better model performance than strict local privacy.

    “Providing stronger guarantees than global privacy, it has better model performance than strict local privacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Bhowmick, 2018, Protection against reconstruction and its applications in private federated learning

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    EPPDA, based on secret sharing to resist the reverse attack, can covertly aggregate user-trained models without disclosing the user model.

    “Similar results have been achieved by EPPDA [69], an efficient privacy-preserving data aggregation method for FL that, based on secret sharing to resist the reverse attack, can covertly aggregate user-trained models without disclosing the user model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [69] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Wang et al. proposed a defensive strategy based on comparing the uploaded model's accuracy and size.

    “Wang et al.proposed a defensive strategy based on comparing the uploaded model's accuracy and size [70].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    TrustFed uses Industrial IoT devices as federated learning candidates and smart contract technology over the Ethereum blockchain to maintain participants' reputations.

    “For example, [76] presents TrustFed, which uses Industrial IoT devices as federated learning candidates and smart contract technology over the Ethereum blockchain to maintain participants' reputations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    DITEN integrates blockchain and FL in edge networks and uses deep neural networks as a strategy scheduler to ensure privacy of user data and enhance learning security.

    “Lu et al. [77] designed a new system, called DITEN, that integrates blockchain and FL in edge networks and uses Deep Neural Networks (DNN) as a strategy scheduler to ensure the privacy of user data and enhance learning security.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [77] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Qu et al.'s approach guarantees block generation efficiency, enabling decentralized privacy protection while preventing single point failure.

    “In such a way, block generation efficiency is guaranteed, enabling decentralized privacy protection while preventing single point failure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Blockchain FL offers advantages such as decentralization, non-tempering, open autonomy, and anonymous traceability.

    “Such a solution offers several advantages such as decentralization, non-tempering, open autonomy, and anonymous traceability [75].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Qu et al. propose storing only the pointer of the global updates on-chain while a distributed hash table is used to save the data.

    “To empower FL with this approach, Qu et al. [72] propose to store only the pointer of the global updates on-chain, while a distributed hash table is used to save the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    A blockchain-based FL should mitigate the overhead of frequent communications in blockchain consensus, which can cause excessive latency.

    “A blockchain-based FL, however, should mitigate the overhead of frequent communications in the blockchain consensus, which can cause excessive latency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    TrustFed can identify and eliminate outliers in the training distributions before combining the model updates.

    “The solution can also identify and eliminate outliers in the training distributions before combining the model updates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Trade-Off Between Communication Overhead and Accuracy

    Two key aspects must be considered for an effective reduction of communication overhead: the total number of communication rounds and the size of messages transmitted in each round.

    “Two key aspects must be considered for an effective reduction of the communication overhead: the total number of communication rounds, and the size of messages transmitted in each round.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Trade-Off Between Communication Overhead and Accuracy

    FedAvg is based on averaging local stochastic gradient descent updates for the primal problem.

    “The most commonly used method for FL, FedAvg [29], is based on averaging local stochastic gradient descent (SGD) updates for the primal problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] McMahan, 2017, Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § V. CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS

    In practice, FL solutions for IoMT suffer from several issues and challenges that should be considered when designing FL-based approaches for healthcare services.

    “However, in practice, these solutions suffer from several issues and challenges that should be considered when designing FL-based approaches for healthcare services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Summary and Discussion

    Some recent techniques can partially solve privacy issues, but the more secure the techniques, the lower the accuracy of the final model may be.

    “Some recent techniques can partially solve these privacy issues [61], however, the more secure the techniques, the lower the accuracy of the final model may be [80].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [61] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [80] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § A. Central Server Failure & Robustness via Decentralization

    A high volume of aggregated data from different parties must be processed by the server.

    “We can mention two main obstacles: (i) a high volume of aggregated data from different parties to be processed by the server; (ii) none of these parties fully trust each others (including the server), thus fearing data leakage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Asynchronous decentralized SGD methods are inherently robust to stragglers but may suffer from slow convergence due to the use of stale models.

    “Although these asynchronous methods are inherently robust to stragglers, they may suffer from slow convergence due to the use of stale models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] Dutta, 2018, Slow and stale gradients can win the race: Error-runtime trade-offs in distributed SGD

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Existing solutions.

    A blockchain-based approach can jointly solve the problem of single-point-of-failure and central trust.

    “Moreover, decentralizing can be combined with blockchain technology, where a blockchain-based approach can jointly solve the problem of single-point-of-failure and central trust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Trade-Off Between Communication Overhead and Accuracy

    Federated networks of IoMT can comprise a massive number of devices, and communication can be many orders of magnitude slower than local computation due to limited bandwidth, energy, and power.

    “Federated networks of IoMT can indeed comprise a massive number of devices (e.g., sensors), and communication in the network can be many orders of magnitude slower than local computation due to limited resources, such as bandwidth, energy, and power [86].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Trade-Off Between Communication Overhead and Accuracy

    FedAvg works well for non-convex problems but does not exhibit convergence guarantees and can diverge in practical settings when data are heterogeneous.

    “While FedAvg has been shown to work well for non-convex problems, it does not exhibit convergence guarantees and can diverge in practical settings when data are heterogeneous [32] (see Section V-D for how to address this problem).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Li, 2020, Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Existing solutions.

    With either peer-to-peer or blockchain solutions, the problem is converted to the pursuit of fault tolerance for the clients.

    “With either solution, i.e., peer-to-peer or blockchain, the problem is converted to the pursuit of fault tolerance for the clients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Summary and Discussion

    Other recent methods use secure multiparty computation or differential privacy, often providing privacy at the cost of reduced model performance or system efficiency.

    “Other recent methods aiming to enhance the privacy of federated learning use tools such as secure multiparty computation or differential privacy.These approaches often provide privacy at the cost of reduced model performance or system efficiency [62].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Summary and Discussion

    The features of FL make it uniquely suited for sensitive data as in IoMT systems, but the architecture and model sharing must address further challenges compared to other fields.

    “In conclusion, the features of FL make it uniquely suited for sensitive data as in the context of IoMT systems, but the architecture and model sharing must address further challenges compared to other fields.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Central Server Failure & Robustness via Decentralization

    A distributed decentralized approach can make the system highly scalable but also opens up issues in gradient synchronization.

    “However, while this distributed approach can help to make the system highly scalable, it also opens up some issues in gradient synchronization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § A. Central Server Failure & Robustness via Decentralization

    None of the parties fully trust each other, including the server, and thus fear data leakage.

    “We can mention two main obstacles: (i) a high volume of aggregated data from different parties to be processed by the server; (ii) none of these parties fully trust each others (including the server), thus fearing data leakage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Blockchain removes the need for a trusted curator, connects each participant through multiparty data retrieval, strengthens the data-sharing scheme, and provides some fault-tolerant guarantees.

    “While blockchain removes the need for a trusted curator and connects each participant through multiparty data retrieval, it also strengthens the data-sharing scheme and provides some fault-tolerant guarantees [83].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [83] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Existing Countermeasures and Solutions

    Lu et al. integrated federated learning into the consensus algorithm of the blockchain to save the hash rate in industrial IoT, where blockchain enables secure data retrieval and ensures accurate model training.

    “In a similar way, Lu et al. [78] integrated federated learning into the consensus algorithm of the blockchain to save the hash rate in the context of industrial IoT, in which blockchain enables secure data retrieval and ensures accurate model training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Trade-Off Between Communication Overhead and Accuracy

    Decentralized training is a potential alternative in FL to reduce high communication costs on the central server.

    “Lastly, decentralized training is a potential alternative in FL to reduce high communication costs on the central server.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    FAug is a data augmentation scheme that can collectively learn the trade-off between privacy leakage and communication overhead using a generative adversarial network.

    “To further improve the transmission of model output, the approach is combined with Federated Augmentation (FAug), a data augmentation scheme that can collectively learn the trade-off between privacy leakage and communication overhead using a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Jeong, 2018, Communication-efficient on-device machine learning: Federated distillation and augmentation under non-IID private data

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Federated Distillation has a communication payload size much smaller than that of a benchmark FL scheme, particularly when the model size is large.

    “Moreover, Jeong et al. [91] presented Federated Distillation (FD), a distributed model training algorithm whose communication payload size is much smaller than that of a benchmark FL scheme, particularly when the model size is large.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Jeong, 2018, Communication-efficient on-device machine learning: Federated distillation and augmentation under non-IID private data

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    FedProx tolerates that any selected device performs partial work and can safely incorporate these partial updates via a proximal term.

    “FedProx [32], for instance, tolerates that any selected device to perform partial work, in compliance with the underlying system's constraints, and can safely incorporate these partial updates via a proximal term.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Li, 2020, Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Existing solutions.

    For medical data collected by IoMT, simple models can be likely inaccurate.

    “However, for medical data collected by IoMT simple models can be likely inaccurate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Federated Distillation exchanges model output instead of model parameters, so that large local models can be adopted on the ML device.

    “On top of conventional periodic communication of FL, the proposed FD exchanges, not the model parameters but the model output, so that large local models can be adopted on the ML device.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Jeong, 2018, Communication-efficient on-device machine learning: Federated distillation and augmentation under non-IID private data

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Clients Synchronization and Fault Tolerance

    While a large number of clients can increase the diversity of the local model across them, this may degrade the performance of FL.

    “In addition, while a large number of clients can increase the diversity of the local model across them, this may degrade the performance of FL [93].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [93] Zhang, 2020, Benchmarking semisupervised federated learning

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    By selecting devices with favorable resources, FedCS provides high classification accuracy in a significantly shorter time compared to classical FL.

    “By selecting the devices with favorable resources, FedCS provides high classification accuracy in a significantly shorter time compared to the classical FL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [94] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Trade-Off Between Communication Overhead and Accuracy

    Recent articles on decentralized training over heterogeneous data with local updating schemes are either restricted to linear models or assume full device participation.

    “Although some recent articles have investigated decentralized training over heterogeneous data with local updating schemes, e.g., [90], they are either restricted to linear models or assume full device participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [90] He, 2018, Cola: Decentralized linear learning

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Using less complex models such as softmax regression is a viable solution for most real-world applications because user behavior phenomena are often simple enough to be captured by relatively simple models.

    “Results confirm that using less complex models, such as softmax regression, is a viable solution for most real-world applications since user behavior phenomena are often simple enough to be captured by relatively simple models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Trade-Off Between Communication Overhead and Accuracy

    A high number of local updating methods can reduce the total number of communication rounds, but reducing the size of messages exchanged at each round via compression schemes can be convenient.

    “Although a high number of local updating methods can effectively reduce the total number of communication rounds, it can be convenient to reduce the size of messages exchanged at each round via compression schemes model, e.g., sparsification, subsampling, and quantization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Konen et al. showed that using CNNs and LSTMs, communication costs can be reduced by two orders of magnitude compared to the original federated learning algorithm.

    “The authors showed how using CNNs and LSTMs, the communication costs can be reduced by two orders of magnitude compared to the original federated learning algorithm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [88] Konen, 2016, Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Clients Synchronization and Fault Tolerance

    IoMT devices from remote areas may be prone to drop due to poor network connectivity or battery failure, so the trained federated model will be biased towards devices with favorable network conditions.

    “IoMT devices from remote areas may be proner to drop due to poor network connectivity or battery failure and, therefore, the trained federated model will be biased towards devices with favorable network conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    A joint-announcement protocol can randomly select devices/clients from a large number of participants and is useful to alleviate the out-of-sync issue and tolerate dropout of some clients before completion of each training iteration.

    “Recent studies present a jointannouncement protocol that can randomly select some devices/ clients from a large number of participants in a given training round [85].Such a joint-announcement protocol is useful to alleviate the out-of-sync issue and tolerate the dropout of some clients at some points before the completion of each training iteration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] Bonawitz, 2019, Toward federated learning at scale: System design

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Little work has evaluated the impact of failures over the FL algorithm or studied directly the effect of dropped devices.

    “However, while several recent studies have investigated convergence guarantees of variants of FL methods [95]- [97], little work has evaluated the impact of failures over the FL algorithm or studied directly the effect of dropped devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [95] Jiang, 2018, A linear speedup analysis of distributed deep learning with sparse and quantized communication

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [96] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [97] Yu, 2019, On the linear speedup analysis of communication efficient momentum SGD for distributed non-convex optimization

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Existing solutions.

    Multi-task learning and meta-learning enable personalized or device-specific modeling, which is considered a valuable attempt to handle the statistical heterogeneity of the data.

    “Both approaches (multi-task and meta-learning) enable personalized or device-specific modeling, which is considered a valuable attempt to handle the statistical heterogeneity of the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Once the trained generator of the GAN is downloaded, each device can replenish the target labels until an IID training dataset is achieved.

    “Once the trained generator of the GAN is downloaded, each device can replenish the target labels until an IID training dataset is achieved”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Jeong, 2018, Communication-efficient on-device machine learning: Federated distillation and augmentation under non-IID private data

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § D. Convergence Guarantees for Non-IID Data

    Non-IID data generation violates the frequently used assumptions of independent and identically distributed data and may cause problems in modeling, theoretical analysis, and empirical evaluation of solutions.

    “This paradigm of data generation violates the frequently-used assumptions of independent and identically distributed (IID) data and may cause problems in modeling, theoretical analysis, and empirical evaluation of solutions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Existing solutions.

    New schemes ensuring fault tolerance would improve the deployment of FL in healthcare where IoMT devices are likely to fault, encounter challenging network conditions, and exhaust their batteries.

    “Therefore, new schemes ensuring fault tolerance would improve the deployment of FL in healthcare where IoMT devices are likely to a fault, encounter challenging network conditions, and exhaust their batteries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § D. Convergence Guarantees for Non-IID Data

    The number of data samples can vary significantly from device to device, and there may be an underlying statistical structure that captures the relationship among devices and their associated distributions.

    “In addition to the variety of data, the number of data samples can vary significantly from device to device, and there may be an underlying statistical structure that captures the relationship among devices and their associated distributions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Existing solutions.

    Part-Data-Sharing introduces a trade-off between accuracy and centralization and could lead to significant communication overhead, especially for medical data.

    “However, despite introducing a trade-off between accuracy and centralization, this could lead to significant communication overhead, especially for medical data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    FAug allows each device to generate missing data samples locally using a conditional GAN to rectify the non-IID training dataset while addressing communication overhead.

    “To rectify the non-IID training dataset while addressing the communication overhead, Jeong et al. [91] proposed FAug, in which each device can generate the missing data samples locally using a generative model, i.e., a conditional GAN.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Jeong, 2018, Communication-efficient on-device machine learning: Federated distillation and augmentation under non-IID private data

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Part-Data-Sharing addresses the statistical challenge of FL when local data is non-IID by distributing a small amount of globally shared data containing examples from each class.

    “It addresses the statistical challenge of FL when local data is non-IID by distributing a small amount of globally shared data containing examples from each class.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Zhao, 2018, Federated learning with non-IID data

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    In ELFISH, the neurons that have less significant weight parameter updates are randomly masked.

    “With ELFISH, the neurons that have less significant weight parameter updates will be randomly masked.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] Xu, 2019, ELFISH: Resource-aware federated learning on heterogeneous edge devices, Ratio

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Anh et al. applied a Deep Q-learning algorithm based on the Double Deep Q-Network (DDQN) to optimize resource allocation for model training.

    “Furthermore, Anh et al. [109] applied a Deep Q-learning algorithm based on the Double Deep Q-Network (DDQN) to optimize resource allocation for model training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [109] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § E. FL With Constrained IoMT Devices

    Training CNN-based models for COVID-19 detection (e.g., ResNet-50) requires storage and memory resources that may not be available on all devices.

    “For example, training CNN-based models for COVID-19 detection (e.g., ResNet-50) requires storage and memory resources that may not be available on all devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    The proposed DDQN-based approach can minimize energy consumption and improve the training latency.

    “The simulation results show that the proposed approach can minimize energy consumption and improve the training latency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [109] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    Data-driven medicine aiming to improve patient care globally requires federated efforts.

    “While machine learning approaches, and especially deep learning, are becoming the de-facto knowledge discovery approach in digital healthcare, it appears that data-driven medicine aiming to improve patient care globally requires federated efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Data-driven medical methods face scarcity and privacy of user data, as well as difficulty of institutions exchanging medical information.
    • Rests on an assumption: With insufficient data, ML is prevented from reaching its full potential, which is only possible if the database consists of the full spectrum of possible anatomies, pathologies, and input data types.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Xu et al. proposed a resource-aware federated learning framework called ELFISH.

    “Similarly, Xu et al. [107] proposed a resource-aware federated learning framework, called ELFISH.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] Xu, 2019, ELFISH: Resource-aware federated learning on heterogeneous edge devices, Ratio

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Jiang et al. proposed a new FL paradigm called PruneFL in order to minimize the model's size.

    “In the same direction, Jiang et al. [108] proposed a new FL paradigm called PruneFL in order to minimize the model's size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Federated Dropout reduces local computations by 1.7x without affecting the accuracy of the model.

    “Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of this solution by reducing the local computations by 1.7× without affecting the accuracy of the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] Caldas, 2018, Expanding the reach of federated learning by reducing client resource requirements

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Data pre-processing is an important step to remove redundancy in the training set and to find the relevant features to be used during model training.

    “In addition, data pre-processing is an important step to remove the redundancy in the training set as well as to find the relevant features to be used during the model training [110], [111].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [110] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [111] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § E. FL With Constrained IoMT Devices

    Using edge computing to provide complementary resources for local model training would require time-consuming data transmission between nano-devices and edge nodes and could lead to network congestion.

    “A possible solution in which edge computing provides complementary resources in support of the local model training [105], would require time-consuming data transmission between the nano-devices and the edge nodes and could lead to network congestion, especially given the huge amount of data generated by these devices every second.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [105] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    Caldas et al. introduce Federated Dropout to reduce the computation load of local training.

    “Caldas et al. [89] introduce Federated Dropout to reduce the computation load of local training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] Caldas, 2018, Expanding the reach of federated learning by reducing client resource requirements

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Existing solutions.

    PruneFL always converges to similar accuracy achieved by classical FL.

    “The experimental results show that PruneFL always converges to similar accuracy achieved by classical FL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    FL is optimizing the drug discovery process by reducing costs and time-to-market for pharmaceutical companies.

    “Already today, FL is improving medical image analysis by providing clinicians with better diagnostic tools, helping find similar patients for true precision medicine, and optimizing the drug discovery process by reducing costs and time-to-market for pharmaceutical companies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    FL is improving medical image analysis by providing clinicians with better diagnostic tools.

    “Already today, FL is improving medical image analysis by providing clinicians with better diagnostic tools, helping find similar patients for true precision medicine, and optimizing the drug discovery process by reducing costs and time-to-market for pharmaceutical companies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    FL is still unable to deliver all its promises and meet the more stringent requirements (e.g., latency, security) of a healthcare system based on multiple IoMT.

    “However, FL is still unable to deliver all its promises and meets the more stringent requirements (e.g., latency, security) of a healthcare system based on multiple Internet of Medical Things (IoMT).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    FL is helping find similar patients for true precision medicine.

    “Already today, FL is improving medical image analysis by providing clinicians with better diagnostic tools, helping find similar patients for true precision medicine, and optimizing the drug discovery process by reducing costs and time-to-market for pharmaceutical companies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    The current settings of FL have not answered all the technical questions.

    “However, the current settings of FL have not answered all the technical questions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    Although no data are shared among the participants by definition in FL systems, some security risks are still present and can be considered as vulnerabilities from multiple aspects.

    “For example, although no data are shared among the participants by definition in FL systems, some security risks are still present and can be considered as vulnerabilities from multiple aspects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    Federated learning appeared as a valuable approach in the medical field, allowing patient data to stay where it is generated.

    “To solve these issues, Federated Learning (FL) appeared as a valuable approach in the medical field, allowing patient data to stay where it is generated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Data-driven medical methods face scarcity and privacy of user data, as well as difficulty of institutions exchanging medical information.
    • Rests on an assumption: With insufficient data, ML is prevented from reaching its full potential, which is only possible if the database consists of the full spectrum of possible anatomies, pathologies, and input data types.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VI. CONCLUSION

    Federated learning can protect sensitive medical data while collaboratively training a learning model.

    “With the promise of powerful, accurate, safe, robust, and unbiased models, federated learning can neatly protect sensitive medical data while collaboratively training a learning model.”
    • Also stated in: § VI. CONCLUSION · plain
      “Since an FL setting allows many clients to collaboratively train a model while keeping training data decentralized, it can protect privacy-sensitive medical data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
120 of 120
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Medical data is highly sensitive and must be protected by appropriate confidentiality procedures.

    “Medical data is highly sensitive and must be protected by means of appropriate confidentiality procedures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Security problems in FL are primarily caused by curious or malicious attackers targeting vulnerabilities of the FL system, which can lead to significant performance drop and sometimes model invalidation.

    “This type of problem is primarily caused by curious or malicious attackers targeting vulnerabilities of the FL system, which can lead to significant performance drop and sometimes model invalidation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In healthcare and IoMT scenarios, an attacker can directly manipulate the model and data of a local affiliation, resulting in a malicious update of the global model or mislabeled data.

    “In the context of healthcare and IoMT scenarios, an attacker can directly manipulate the model and data of a local affiliation, resulting in a malicious update of the global model or mislabeled data.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Increased heterogeneity of data sources can decrease model performance, bottleneck the network, and increase storage and processing costs.

    “Moreover, the increase in heterogeneity of data sources could decrease the performance of the model, bottleneck the whole network, and cause an extra computational cost for both storage and processing.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In global privacy-enhancing mechanisms, the global server is trusted.

    “In other words, in a global privacy-enhancing mechanism, the global server is assumed trusted, while in local privacy, the central server may be malicious.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Data breaches can result in reduced public trust.

    “because data breaches can result in reduced public trust.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some IoMT devices, even though not limited in size, have limitations in the available on-board resources.

    “Some IoMT devices, even though not limited in size, come with limitations in the available on-board resources.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Data-driven medical methods face scarcity and privacy of user data, as well as difficulty of institutions exchanging medical information.

    “Despite the profitable usage of AI-based algorithms, these data-driven methods are facing issues such as the scarcity and privacy of user data, as well as the difficulty of institutions exchanging medical information.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    With insufficient data, ML is prevented from reaching its full potential, which is only possible if the database consists of the full spectrum of possible anatomies, pathologies, and input data types.

    “With insufficient data, ML is prevented from reaching its full potential, which is only possible if the database consists of the full spectrum of possible anatomies, pathologies, and input data types.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some recent surveys on federated learning in medicine and healthcare focus on electronic health records or internet of medical things without paying attention to medical imaging.

    “However, some of them focus on electronic health records [21,22] or internet of medical things [26], without paying attention to medical imaging.”

    From Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reference 43 is attributed to the wrong first author

    Minor

    The text attributes FedHealth to Chan et al., but reference 43 lists Y. Chen as its first author.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bonawitz, 2019, Toward federated learning at scale: System design, 1, 374
  2. 10.1109/tit.2019.2904055 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aouedi, O., Sacco, A., Piamrat, K., & Marchetto, G.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (FR)
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2023-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
790-803
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4283373300
Cited by
165
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
federated learning, privacy-preserving machine learning, medical data privacy, Internet of Medical Things, security vulnerabilities, data scarcity, health data sharing
MeSH terms
Internet of Things, Algorithms, Humans, Databases, Factual, Privacy, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review