The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media Image Retrieval Using Distilled Convolutional Neural Network for Suspicious e-Crime and Terrorist Account Detection
Abstract
Retrieval of images with object-of-interest from a vast pool of social media images has been a research interest in cyber crime research community for detecting criminal behaviors in social media. Due to inherent diversity and the low duplicate property of images on social media, it brings forth many challenges in image retrieval, especially in identifying distinct features for a given object-of-interest. Previous literature approached this problem with extended General Hough Transform, where Hough space is analyzed for each specific object-of-interest. Different objects of interest produce different types of patterns in Hough space and no unified framework can be easily established to incorporate all those patterns. In this paper, we propose a unified framework based on convolutional neural network (CNN) for classifying the social media images and retrieving the images based on the probability score from the softmax classifier. In our framework, a reduced size CNN model is trained by distilling the knowledge from a pretrained full size CNN model, which is suitable for applications with limited training data such as ours and results in a higher accuracy in image retrieval as well as better performance in execution speed in comparison with the full size CNN model. Experiments on three image datasets relating to suspicious e-crime and terrorist involvement - Guy Fawkes masks, credit card logos, and ISIS logos show that our framework outperforms extended General Hough Transform…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Detecting such offenses in public communications on social media and public chats is relatively easy, as they can be monitored by employing content moderators who assess the content manually or through an automated mechanism such as using profanity filters [18,19].”
From Online grooming detection: A comprehensive survey of child exploitation in chat logs (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features
Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_32 · Cited by 14,955 · cited 3×
“SIFT and variants of SIFT [1-2] have been very popular for generating feature points for visual descriptions of objects-of-interest.”
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
Learning methods for generic object recognition with invariance to pose and lighting
LeCun, Y., Huang, F. J., & Bottou, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315150 · Cited by 1,324
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1109/CVPR.2014.222 · DOI · Paper page
- mishkin, 2016, Systematic evaluation of CNN advances on the ImageNet, arXiv preprint arXiv 1606 02228
- hinton, 2015, Distilling the knowledge in a neural network, arXiv preprint arXiv 1503
- 10.1145/2647868.2654889 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0031-3203(81)90009-1 · DOI
- 10.4018/ijmdem.2015070103 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5540064 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126504 · DOI
- 10.1145/2422956.2422960 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Online grooming detection: A comprehensive survey of child exploitation in chat logs
Borj, P. R., Raja, K., & Bours, P. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110039 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Chitrakar, P., Zhang, C., Warner, G., & Liao, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-12
- Pages
- 493-498
- OpenAlex
- W2578533030
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- knowledge distillation, convolutional neural networks, limited training data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review