Real-time in-situ visual feedback of task performance in mixed environments for learning joint psychomotor-cognitive tasks
Abstract
This paper proposes an approach to mixed environment training of manual tasks requiring concurrent use of psychomotor and cognitive skills. To train concurrent use of both skill sets, the learner is provided real-time generated, in-situ presented visual feedback of her performance. This feedback provides reinforcement and correction of psychomotor skills concurrently with guidance in developing cognitive models of the task.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In realistic VR systems, abstract augmented concurrent feedback was rated beneficial by medical educators and students for learning clinical breast exams.
“but has been rated to be beneficial by medical educators and students for learning clinical breast exams (Kotranza, Lind, Pugh, & Lok, 2009)”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Kotranza, Lind, Pugh, & Lok, 2009
Cites
Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review
Holden, M. K. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Augmented Feedback Presented in a Virtual Environment Accelerates Learning of a Difficult Motor Task
Todorov, E., Shadmehr, R., & Bizzi, E. (1997) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899709600829 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 · Cited by 1,416 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kotranza, A., Scott Lind, D., Pugh, C. M., & Lok, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-10
- Pages
- 125-134
- ISSN
- 1554-7868 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127577568
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Association for Surgical Education
- University of Florida
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- real-time visual feedback, cognitive modeling, human-robot interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
