Parameter estimation of LFM signals intercepted by a composite local oscillation SNYFR
Abstract
Nyquist Folding Receiver (NYFR) is a novel ultrawideband interception receiver architecture, which can sample a large range wideband signal by single Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC). And the Synchronous Nyquist Folding Receiver (SNYFR) is an improved structure of NYFR. In this paper, a new SNYFR structure based on composite Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated (SFM) Local Oscillator (LO) is proposed. For Linear Frequency Modulated (LFM) signals intercepted by this SNYFR, a Nyquist Zone (NZ) estimation and parameter estimation algorithm based on instantaneous autocorrelation is deduced. The complexity of the algorithm is lower, which reduces the difficulty of resolving the LFM/SFM hybrid modulated signals after the ADC of SNYFR. Computer simulation shows that effective detection of multi-component LFM signals and accurate parameters estimation can be achieved by the proposed algorithm when the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is better than -8dB.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The method based on RANSAC and FrFT outperformed the spectrum peak search method, the autocorrelation method, and the QMFB method.
“It is clear from the figures that the method based on RANSAC and FrFT outperformed the other methods”
The autocorrelation method requires specific autocorrelation interval, which is not applicable to the signal less than an LO frequency modulation period.
“the autocorrelation method requires specific autocorrelation interval, which is not applicable to the signal less than an LO frequency modulation period.”
Cites
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994 · see citing works
Donoho, D. L. (2004) · Cited by 16,703 · see citing works
Use of the Discrete Fourier Transform in the Measurement of Frequencies and Levels of Tones
Rife, D. C., & Vincent, G. A. (1970) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01766.x · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Design of hybrid filter banks for analog/digital conversion
Velazquez, S. R., Nguyen, T. Q., & Broadstone, S. R. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.668549 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Analog-to-Information and the Nyquist Folding Receiver
Maleh, R., Fudge, G. L., Boyle, F. A., et al. (2012) · IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2012.2223611 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Time-Interleaved Analog-to-Digital-Converter Compensation Using Multichannel Filters
Lim, Y. C., Zou, Y., Lee, J. W., et al. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2008.2012216 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
A Nyquist folding analog-to-information receiver
Fudge, G. L., Bland, R. E., Chivers, M. A., Ravindran, S., Haupt, J., & Pace, P. E. (2008) · 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers · doi:10.1109/acssc.2008.5074464 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
PARAMETER ESTIMATION OF LFM SIGNAL INTERCEPTED BY SYNCHRONOUS NYQUIST FOLDING RECEIVER
Zeng, D., Cheng, H., Zhu, J., & Tang, B. (2011) · Progress In Electromagnetics Research C · doi:10.2528/pierc11062801 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Qiu, Z., Wang, P., Zhu, J., et al. (2016) · EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · doi:10.1186/s13634-016-0387-2 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Odejide, O. O., Akujuobi, C. M., Annamalai, A., et al. (2009) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc.2009.5198754 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Intercept of frequency agility signal using coding Nyquist folding receiver
Long, K. (2011) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parameter Estimation of SAR Signal Based on SVD for the Nyquist Folding Receiver
Li, T., Zhu, Q., & Chen, Z. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18061768 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, X., Li, T., Fan, X., & Chen, Z. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19061477 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“We compared the proposed method with the spectrum peak search method [21], the autocorrelation method [22] and the QMFB method [23] described in Section 1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Li, T., Fan, X., Zhu, Q., & Chen, Z.
- Affiliations
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Venue
- 2017 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 392-397
- OpenAlex
- W2784001966
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Signal Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
- Keywords
- linear frequency modulated signals, parameter estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review